My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
10/24/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:20 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:37:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Currently, county LDRs allow civic and social membership clubs in the MED, CL, and CG <br />commercial districts only. Accordingly, existing social clubs in the unincorporated county are <br />located in commercial districts (e.g. Polish American Club and the Moose Lodge). Thus, the current <br />LDRs treat these types of club uses similar to restaurants and ban;, uses which are purely commercial <br />in nature. The Board's direction is to treat such clubs similar to a type of `community service" use, <br />such as a not-for-profit facility or theater or community center. Thus, the essential use question is <br />whether or not social clubs should be treated as a bar/restaurant commercial type of use or as a <br />community service type of use. Based upon the Board's direction, staff has drafted an LDR <br />amendment that treats social clubs as a community service type use with strict conditions. <br />Under the proposed LDR amendment, civic and social membership clubs would be allowed as <br />special exception uses in M-1 and M-2 (the county's highest density residential) designated areas <br />only, on sites that front on a Thoroughfare Plan road and that have sufficient area to accommodate <br />significant setbacks. The proposed setback and buffering criteria were derived from existing criteria <br />for community centers and schools that are located in residentially designated areas. These setbacks <br />(50' to 100') and buffering requirements are necessary to ensure compatibility with adjacent <br />residential uses, and will ensure that such clubs would be located on larger sites (probably 2 or more <br />acres in size to accommodate the facility and special setbacks). <br />If the proposed amendment is adopted, then social clubs will continue to be permitted uses in <br />commercial districts and will be allowed as special exception uses only in M-1 and M-2 designated <br />areas in the A-1. RM -8. and RM -10 districts, subject to special criteria. <br />PSAC Recommendation: Voted 6-1 to deny the proposed amendment, keep the <br />commercial district requirement for social clubs, and amend <br />the LDRs to allow social clubs in the CH district where bars <br />and restaurants are currently allowed. <br />PZC Recommendation: Voted 41 to approve the proposed ordinance to allow social <br />clubs as special exception uses in M-1 and M-2 areas. <br />Staff Recommendation: To approve the proposed LDR amendment, based on the <br />Board's directive. <br />Group Homes and ALFs in the MED District <br />The MED (Medical) district is designed to include medical uses and uses that complement medical <br />uses and exclude uses that can and should be accommodated outside of a medical node. <br />Consequently, the MED district allows family counseling services, but does not allow retail <br />department stores. Some uses which have health care and residential characteristics, such as nursing <br />homes, are specifically listed as permitted uses in the MED district. Although group homes and <br />adult congregate living facilities are similar to nursing homes and complement medical uses, the <br />MED district does not currently specifically allow such uses. Even so, the county has interpreted <br />group home and ACLF (ALF) uses to be less intense types of "nursing home" uses and has allowed <br />them in the MED district based on that interpretation (e.g. National Health Corporation and Hospice <br />House projects). This interpretation is logical and needs to be codified. The proposed staff -initiated <br />amendment would specify that group homes and ALFs are permitted institutional uses in the MED <br />district. <br />PSAC Recommendation: Voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance. <br />PZC Recommendation: Voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance. <br />ocTo��� a�� PG 6 5 I <br />-80- <br />0 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.