My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/7/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
11/7/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2018 4:16:05 PM
Creation date
6/9/2015 1:47:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/07/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PDs shall not exceed the density allowed by the underlying land use designation. In addition to <br />providing developers with more design flexibility, the PD process also gives the Board of County <br />Commissioners more discretion, compared to regular subdivision projects, with respect to project <br />approvals. <br />There are two key requirements that are applicable to Agricultural PDs, but not applicable to non - <br />Agricultural PDs. The first is that lots cannot exceed one acre in size, while the second is that lots <br />must be clustered on a relatively small portion of the overall project property. The remainder of the <br />site, regardless of its ownership, must remain in open space (either as natural; agricultural; or to a <br />limited degree, recreational, areas) for as long as the property retains an agricultural land use <br />designation. <br />Over the past few years, several proposed Agricultural PDs have been considered by the Board of <br />County Commissioners at public hearings. In reviewing those proposals, both the public and the <br />Board questioned whether Agricultural PDs and clustering should be required and whether there <br />were benefits associated with clustering. <br />As a result of that questioning, the following public meetings on this issue were conducted: <br />• two Board of County Commissioners workshops; <br />• two Agricultural Advisory Committee workshops; and <br />• one Professional Services Advisory Committee meeting. <br />At the April 4, 2000, Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board instructed staff to initiate <br />a plan amendment to eliminate the requirement that any residential development of agriculturally <br />designated land must be approved as an Agricultural PD. <br />The revisions related to Agricultural PDs involve changes to the Land Use Analysis section of the <br />Future Land Use Element, and to Future Land Use Element Policies 1.10 and 5.8. In addition to <br />eliminating the Agricultural PD requirement, those revisions make Agricultural PDs and clustering <br />an optional (rather than required) development type for agriculturally designated land. <br />While the revisions eliminate the requirement that residential development of agriculturally, <br />designated areas be done only through the Agricultural PD process with clustering required, the <br />amendment also makes some changes to the soon to be optional Agricultural PD requirements. <br />Those changes include the following: <br />• The open space area must be under the ownership of a single entity and maintained as open <br />space, in perpetuity, through a conservation and/or agricultural preservation easement. 1 <br />• The clustered lots must be grouped together in a compact, contiguous manner. <br />• Golf courses are not permitted as part of Agricultural PDs. <br />Caribbean Fruit Fly Host Plants <br />As part of the Evaluation and Appraisal Process, the county added a policy restricting Caribbean <br />Fruit Fly "host' plants in certain types of new development on agriculturally designated land. The <br />existence of Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants near active citrus groves can adversely affect protocol <br />approval of grove fruit. For that reason, the county adopted a policy that requires the following <br />special conditions for Administrative Permit, Special Exception and/or Planned Development <br />approval of projects on agriculturally designated land: <br />November 7, 2000 <br />102 <br />iL: & 1 15 P 8 <br />0 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.