Laserfiche WebLink
The northern four subject parcels under contract are owned by Marie Simmons (1/2) & Universal Life <br />Church c/o Peter Sabonjohn, Trustee(1/2), with the remaining four parcels under contract owned by Laura <br />Andre. The current tax assessed value of the parcels is $392,354 (Simmons - $178,630; Andre - $213,724). <br />Two issues which are important to staff with respect to all proposed purchases are obtaining cost share <br />assistance in property acquisition and addressing management costs. <br />Cost -Share <br />As previously indicated, Indian River County has been awarded a 50% cost -share grant from the FCT for <br />the purchase, including 500/o of pre-acquisition expenditures (e.g., environmental audit, survey, appraisals). <br />Management Costs <br />Besides cost share, management cost is always an issue with environmental land acquisition. The FCT <br />program, which is highly competitive statewide, awards points for projects based on the provision of <br />resource-based public access facilities. In order to qualify for FCT cost -share funding, the County obligated <br />itself in its FCT application to provide limited access and resource-based facilities on the overall project <br />property. <br />Specifically, conditions of the Conceptual Approval Agreement include County provision of nature trails, <br />including a wetland boardwalk, on the overall Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project property. Habitat management <br />(e.g., exotic plant removal) is also required under the cost -share agreement. Because the overall Oyster Bar <br />Salt Marsh is nearby to Round Island County Park, which has parking and restroom facilities among other <br />improvements, public access improvements on the subject parcels will be minimal. A bicycle path <br />connection along S.R. AIA can be used for access to the property from Round Island Park (Riverside). <br />Relating to long term management, the property will be incorporated into the county -wide park system and <br />managed by the County Parks Division in coordination with county environmental planning staff. Volunteer <br />groups will be asked to assist the County with certain aspects of property management such as nature trail <br />up -keep and litter patrol. <br />A draft management plan for the overall project has been drafted (see Attachment #2). The plan reflects the <br />management aspects described herein, and is subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners <br />and the Governing Body of the FCT prior to County closing on the property. Page 21 of the draft <br />management plan summarizes anticipated management costs of the overall Oyster Bar Salt Marsh project <br />(see Attachment #3). <br />Allowance of Duck Hunting <br />The Oyster Bar Salt Marsh is currently used by duck hunters during a brief hunting season in the Fall of each <br />Year. The County Commission has received a number of letters in the past from hunters urging the County <br />to allow duck hunting to continue if the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh is purchased by the County. A concern <br />expressed by hunters is that two previously hunted sites, the Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area (ORCA) <br />and the Round Island South Conservation Area, are now closed to hunting due to County purchase of the <br />lands for conservation. <br />County staff s position is that it is compatible, for this particular project, for the County to allow continuation <br />of duck hunting at the marsh, which has occurred for many years on a seasonal basis as regulated by the <br />Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Compared to the ORCA property, which is actively <br />used by school groups and other groups for environmental education excursions, the Oyster Bar Salt Marsh <br />property, which is relatively remote from development, is more appropriate for seasonal hunting. LAAC, <br />at its meeting on October 25, considered the duck hunting issue and voted to support the allowance of the <br />hunting to continue as "status quo." with the understanding that the County could always reconsider the <br />allowance if it becomes a public nuisance or land management conflict. <br />November 7, 2000 <br />124 <br />GK 1 15 PG 8 3 3 <br />