Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit B <br />Mandel, Jeffrey <br />From: Mandel, Jeffrey <br />Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 9:35 AM <br />To: 'jpp111934@aol.com' <br />Cc: Joi Gibson; 'mmierzwa@mierzwalaw.com' <br />Subject: RE: Indian River County and Local 2201 <br />Point well taken. Thank you. <br />Jeffrey E. Mandel <br />Attorney at Law <br />jmandel@Iaborlawyers.com O: (407) 541-0850 I F: (407) 541-0887 <br />200 South Orange Avenue Suite 1100 I Orlando, FL 32801 <br />FISHER & PHILLIPS ur <br />vCard I Bio Website Representing employers nationally in labor and employment matters <br />Atlanta I Baltimore I Boston I Charlotte 1 Chicago I Cleveland I Columbia 1 Columbus I Dallas I Denver I Fort Lauderdale I Gulfport <br />Houston I Irvine I Kansas City I Las Vegas I Los Angeles I Louisville I Memphis I New England I New Jersey I New Orleans <br />Orlando I Philadelphia I Phoenix I Portland I San Antonio I San Diego I San Francisco I Tampa I Washington, DC <br />This message originates from the law firm of Fisher & Phillips LLP and may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended <br />solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify us at <br />postmaster ((�IabpNawvers,com and please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other <br />use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. <br />From: ipp111934@aol.com [mailto:ipp111934@aol.com] <br />Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 9:08 PM <br />To: Mandel, Jeffrey <br />Subject: Re: Indian River County and Local 2201 <br />Jeff I am at a loss to understand the issue re 26.07(C). You stated the Union's revised language of the Union's proposal <br />on 26.07(C) is the same as your proposal Article 26.07.A "Returning from Medical Leave". If so, it appears you have <br />agreement. Obviously I had a "typo" error on page 7 of my recommendation, citing 26.06 twice. As long as you and the <br />Union are on the same page relative to retum to work, my intent was to adopt your proposal. John J. Popular <br />Original Message <br />From: Mandel, Jeffrey <imandelAlaborlawyers.com> <br />To: jpp111934 <jpp11193402aol.com> <br />Cc: Matthew Mierzwa <joibson(dlmierzwalaw.com> <br />Sent: Fri, Jan 2, 2015 10:56 am <br />Subject: RE: Indian River County and Local 2201 <br />So sorry to bother you again. Just one other point of clarification. In its <br />renumbered 26.07, the County proposed that employees on medical leave for 21 <br />calendar days or more must provide medical certification that they are fit for <br />duty at least 24 hours prior to reporting for work. The Union proposed the same <br />language in their new paragraph C of the "Charging Leave" section. You <br />recommended in favor of the County's "Charging Leave" section, thereby <br />1 <br />36 <br />