Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit B <br />Mandel, Jeffrey <br />From: Mandel, Jeffrey <br />Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 9:36 AM <br />To: 'jpp111934@aol.com' <br />Cc:'mmierzwa@mierzwalaw.com'; Joi Gibson <br />Subject: RE: Indian River County and Local 2201 <br />Thank you. <br />Jeffrey E. Mandel <br />Attorney at Law <br />jmandel©Iaborlawyers.com 10: (407) 541-0850 I F: (407) 541-0887 <br />200 South Orange Avenue 1 Suite 1100 1 Orlando, FL 32801 <br />FISHER & PHILLIPS u. <br />vCa)dI. Bio (• Website Representing employers nationally in labor and employment matters <br />Atlantal Baltimore 1 Boston l Charlotte I Chicago I Cleveland I Columbia 1 Columbus 1 Dallas I Denver 1 Fort Lauderdale 1 Gulfport <br />Houston l Irvine 1 Kansas City 1 Las Vegas 1 Los Angeles I Louisville 1 Memphis 1 New England 1 New Jersey I New Orleans <br />Orlando 1 Philadelphia 1 Phoenix I Portland 1 San Antonio 1 San Diego 1 San Francisco I Tampa l Washington, DC <br />This message originates from the law firm of Fisher & Phillips LLP and may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended <br />solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify us at <br />postmasterfallaborlawvers.com and please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other <br />use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. <br />From: jpp111934@aol.com jmailto:jpp111934@aol.com] <br />Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 8:42 PM <br />To: Mandel, Jeffrey <br />Subject: Re: Indian River County and Local 2201 <br />Jeff My recollection is that the Union proposed a 2 year contract and management wanted 3 years. I also recall that <br />management was opposed to retroactivity, therefore I attempted to deal with the reality of a prospective contract effective <br />2015. Given this scenario (i.e., no retroactivity), for all practical purposes the parties lost a year (Oct 2013 -Sept 2014), <br />The reality is that January xx 2015 -September 2017 is less than a 3 year contract which squares with Florida law. In <br />effect contract duration was an issue that was addressed by my recommendation for a contract. If it is the mutual opinion <br />of both parties that Florida law would mandate an effective date of October 1,2013 then September 30, 2016 should be <br />deemed the expiration date. If so page 10 of the recommendation should be revised to read: <br />"Effective October 1,2015 through September 30, 2016: (1) For Fiscal year 2015-16 "...bargaining unit employees <br />shall receive the same cost of living increases, if any, provided to general non -bargaining unit employees under the <br />County Administrator's purview" <br />(2) Adopt Employer 3402 (B) with revised CBA language reading "fiscal year 2015-16, as shown in Attachment C, a <br />2.5% increase effective the first full pay period of April 1, 2016". <br />It's my opinion the parties retain the option to use "Recommendations" as a baseline to explore areas of mutual <br />agreement and tailor the labor agreement accordingly. FYI e-mail address is jpp111934aaol.com <br />John J. Popular <br />1 <br />40 <br />