My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/19/2015 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
05/19/2015 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2018 1:17:06 PM
Creation date
8/12/2015 1:26:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/19/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Solid Waste Processing and Recycling Services RFI/RFP Process Feasibility S 015 i Page 2 of t <br /> storage of household hazardous waste, and waste tire management. This contract is due to expire <br /> on December 31, 2017; therefore, this is an ideal time to explore the interest of private sector <br /> vendors in developing a processing system designed to divert a high percentage of waste from <br /> disposal (e.g., 50% more). <br /> The waste composition study conducted as part of the Master Plan project revealed that <br /> approximately 38%of residential and commercial solid waste disposed consists of potentially <br /> recyclable material, and an additional 32%consists of organic materials that could potentially be <br /> processed. The Master Plan outlined a three-phase approach to assist the County in charting a <br /> pathway toward achieving the State's 75% recycling goal. Phase 1 includes an RFI/RFP process to <br /> explore the viability of processing technologies that achieve high material recovery rates. Phases 2 <br /> and 3 are driven by the results of the RFI/PRP process, which will determine whether an <br /> economically viable mixed waste processing technology is available. <br /> Technologies and Vendors <br /> In an effort to achieve higher recycling goals, alternative processing technologies have gained <br /> attention in recent years. Such technologies fall into three general categories: mechanical, <br /> biological/chemical, and thermal. Development of these technologies varies, but numerous <br /> companies operate demonstration or commercial facilities. In most cases, biological/chemical and <br /> thermal technologies require segregated materials or some degree of pre-processing prior to core <br /> technology. <br /> Numerous mixed waste processing facilities operate on a commercial-scale in the U.S. Unlike a <br /> traditional material recovery facility (MRF) at which source separated recyclables are processed, a <br /> mixed waste MRF recovers recyclables from the mixed municipal waste stream. Some state-of-the- <br /> art mixed waste MRFs report diverting up to 75%of the waste stream from disposal. Mixed waste <br /> MRFs can process the entire waste stream or just a portion of it, such as multi-family and <br /> commercial waste. They often complement existing recycling programs rather than replace them. <br /> In fact, MRFs that process mixed waste often include processing lines for single stream recyclables. <br /> Different technologies can be integrated into a single facility. For example, some facilities recover <br /> recyclable commodities, as well as organics for further processing through composting or anaerobic <br /> digestions (AD). <br /> In May 2014, KCI coordinated and facilitated a site visit for Vincent Burke and Himanshu Mehta to a <br /> state-of-the-art mixed waste processing facility in Montgomery, AL operated by Infinitus Energy. <br /> County and KCI staff toured the facility and met with Kyle Mowitz, CEO of Infinitus Energy, to <br /> discuss planning,financing, construction, startup, and performance testing of the facility. The <br /> facility, which is capable of processing 150,000-200,000 tons per year, cost approximately$35 <br /> million for the site, building, and equipment, and was constructed in about 18 months. <br /> According to Mr. Mowitz, the facility is diverting between 50%and 60% of incoming waste for <br /> recycling and beneficial reuse and is targeting more than 70%diversion once Phase 2 of the project <br /> (anaerobic digestion facility) is completed. Issues have been raised regarding the quality of <br /> recovered materials from a mixed waste MRF, but Mr. Mowitz stated that marketing materials from <br /> the Montgomery facility has not been a problem. A future Phase 3 process would work to convert <br /> residuals to an engineered fuel, but that is still early in the design stage. <br /> kessler consulting inc. <br /> innovative waste solutions <br /> 266 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.