My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/02/2015 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2015
>
06/02/2015 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2018 2:16:38 PM
Creation date
8/12/2015 2:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/02/2015
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 3 <br /> BCC Agenda Item <br /> Sector 5 Beach Restoration Project <br /> May 27, 2015 <br /> Although a complete feasibility study was not conducted to identify all project alternatives, a <br /> dune only construction project is consistent with the County's goal of avoiding adverse impacts <br /> to environmental resources including nearshore Hardbottom. If a project were to proceed <br /> without the Federal commitment it is anticipated that a feasibility study could take up to 1.5 <br /> years and another 2 years for design and permitting. <br /> City of Vero Beach Ordinance Relative to Beach Restoration <br /> The City of Vero Beach enacted an ordinance in 1989 which prohibits them from spending any <br /> tax dollars on beach restoration without a referendum. Section 2.09 of City Charter prescribes: <br /> Unless specifically authorized to do so by one or more local binding referendum <br /> elections, the City of Vero Beach shall not on beaches owned by or within the municipal <br /> limits of the City of Vero Beach, directly or indirectly, expend tax dollars from whatever <br /> source (local, state or federal)on beach restoration except in the amount necessary to <br /> protect life or property during storms or other natural disaster. (Res. No. 89-19, 3-15- <br /> 1989). <br /> Following concerns that a future beach restoration project in City limits would trigger the <br /> referendum requirement, the City Attorney's office (Memorandum dated October 7, 2014 <br /> attached) reviewed current City Ordinances and Florida Statues. Based on the City Attorney's <br /> opinion the Charter referendum requirement of Section 2.09 would not be triggered if the County <br /> were to sponsor a beach restoration study/project within the City limits. <br /> ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES <br /> Alternative 1: Abandon Feasibility Cost Share Agreement with the USACE. This alternative <br /> would abandon Federal assistance on the Sector 5 Project area and perhaps prevent the County <br /> from future Federal participation on this project. <br /> During the March 16, 2015 Indian River County Beach and Shore Advisory Committee (Beach <br /> Committee) meeting, the USACE discussed the GRR and Federal process. Following the USACE <br /> presentation, the Beach Committee expressed several concerns about the GRR and Federal <br /> process. Following discussions, the Beach Committee unanimously approved a supporting <br /> motion to continue with Federal funding for the Sector 5 Beach Restoration Project and <br /> requested staff to provide additional information at the next committee meeting. <br /> F:\Public Works\JamesG\Sector 5\Federal\Feasibility Cost Share Agreement\agenda item Department of Army Feasibility Cost Share 199 <br /> Agreement--Sector 5 Shore Protection Project--REV 5-27-15.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.