Laserfiche WebLink
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Wheeler, SECONDED by Board <br /> Member Davis, by a 5-0 vote, the Board approved <br /> recommendation#2., that the subject appeals be scheduled for a re- <br /> hearing before a different Special Magistrate, as recommended in <br /> the memorandum. <br /> Board Member Brombach recalled problems with Mr. Robinson last year when the Board had to <br /> reschedule its meeting because his worksheets were not ready on time. Also, she felt that they <br /> would be doing themselves a disservice by hearing the appeals themselves. Chairman O'Bryan <br /> agreed, and Board Member Wheeler commented on the fact that last year the Board had to wait <br /> an hour or longer to receive the worksheets during a meeting. <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Board Member Davis, SECONDED by <br /> L. Vice Chairman Wheeler, to approve recommendation#3, not to <br /> renew the services of Mr. Robinson, as recommended in the <br /> memorandum. <br /> Board Member Brombach thought the Board took this action at a prior meeting the year before. <br /> Chairman O'Bryan stated that the Board did authorize Mr. Robinson to be hired last year, but <br /> they did change the contract to have a penalty, if the reports were not filed in a timely manner. <br /> Upon reviewing Mr. Robinson's invoice, it appeared to Chairman O'Bryan that Mr. Robinson <br /> did the fewest number of actual petition hearings and ended up charging the most amount of <br /> money. He pointed out that the office review hours were very high, and one of the changes that <br /> the Board made last year was for the Special Magistrates to remain on site to finish their reports. <br /> Vice Chairman Wheeler agreed, and, in closing, commented that there were many <br /> inconsistencies across-the-board in this third year. <br /> Value Adjustment Board Meeting Page 5 <br /> February 25, 2008 <br />