01/15/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

collector roads where MSBU's are not established; and 3) apply alternative pavement technologies including open graded asphaltic concrete with a coquina/shell mixes base in rural areas where appropriate [e.g. Fellsmere and western county]. This would apply to low volume roads.) 11.G.2. RIVERPOINT SUBDIVISION SECURITY GATE - (TONY ESPOSITO) Public Works Director James Davis reviewed a Memorandum of January 9, 2002: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., Public Works Director SUBJECT: Riverpoint Subdivision Security Gate DATE: January 9, 2002 It is requested that the information presented herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the ✓ egular meeting of January 15, 2002. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS At the October 16, 2001, Board of County Commissioners meeting, Mr. and Mrs. Tony Esposito, 624 23rd Street SE, and Mrs. Linda Huber, 653 23 St. SE, addressed the Board of County Commissioners ✓ egarding problems with the entrance gate at the adjacent Riverpoint Subdivision. According to the Espositos and Mrs Huber, the entrance gate adversely affects their properties by blocking an adjacent fire hydrant, opening onto private property, requiring vehicles denied entry to turn around in the Espositos' and Hubers' driveways, requiring oversized vehicles to park on 23rd Street SE where they block_ access to property, and causing other problems. While many subdivisions throughout the County are gated, most of t hose gates are on private roads which intersect public roads at a 90 -degree angle. Riverpoint's gate, however, is located where a public road terminates and a private road begins. Because of the issues involved with the Riverpoint gate, the County has changed its land development regulations. Now, entrance gates must be designed such that off-site problems will not occur. January 15, 2002 70 nOAths_d � 0