Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />She supported sharing the cost, not putting it all on the benefitted owner. <br />Vice Chairman Tippet complimented staff on this compilation and commented that <br />roadwork is past due. Also, Commissioner Adams' district was not the only one to have this <br />severe and agitating problem. It was time to take some action and face this very costly issue. <br />He supported recommendations #1, #2, and #3. He believed #4 needed to be studied as well <br />as #6. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Tippin, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Adams, to begin immediately <br />with recommendations 1, 2, and 3. <br />Discussion was held and there appeared to be consensus that recommendations 4 and <br />6 needed more study but the first three could start quickly. <br />Chairman Stanbridge thought she was hearing consensus on #5 that the County <br />needed to charge ``real world prices" particularly because of the equipment. <br />Commissioner Ginn thought that on number 5 some costs could be removed/not <br />charged, such as staff time. <br />Chairman Stanbridge thanked Director Davis for thinking outside the box and for <br />seeing the water -quality issues as a way to get some grants. <br />THE CI IAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried unanimously. (Approved: 1) apply for stormwater <br />grants for road paving, focusing on those roads closest to the <br />Indian River Lagoon, St. Sebastian River, and surface waters of <br />State concern, 2) Extend the special assessment payment <br />program from two years to five years for paving local and <br />January 15, 2002 <br />• <br />69 <br />rot r <br />11 <br />1.1. a <br />1 U a <br />