My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/30/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
1/30/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2022 3:25:49 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:12:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/30/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2275
Subject
Lost Tree Village
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendation : <br /> It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached <br /> letter or one substantially similar thereto , and authorize the chairman to execute and <br /> dispatch same . <br /> Discussion : <br /> The County' s outside counsel for the above- referenced case recommends that the <br /> Board of County Commissioners issue the attached letter containing reasons for denial of <br /> administrative permit use and site plan approval for a telecommunications tower. <br /> BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br /> 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 <br /> Telephone: (561 ( 567- 8000 7� "e�p•�s� G" <br /> January 30 , 2001 <br /> �lORiOp' <br /> Alan L . Gabriel , Esq . <br /> Law Offices of Alan L . Gabriel <br /> 2455 E . Sunrise Blvd . , PH- E <br /> Ft . Lauderdale , FL 33304 <br /> Re : Nextel South Corp. d/b/a Nextel Communications <br /> Application to Construct Commercial Communications Tower on the <br /> West End of the Immanuel Baptist Church <br /> Located at 455 S . W . 58 `h Avenue <br /> Nextel Monopole Telecommunications Tower Appeal <br /> AA -00- 11 - 147/2000080160-24614 <br /> Dear Mr. Gabriel : <br /> This letter will serve to confirm that the above-described application has been denied <br /> pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners ' decision to uphold the above-referenced appeal <br /> and overturn the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board. <br /> Indian River County Ordinances attempt to "reasonably accommodate telecommunication <br /> needs in a non -discriminatory and competitive neutral manner while ensuring safety, appropriate <br /> locations of communications towers and antennas, avoiding an unnecessary proliferation of new <br /> tower sites and minimizing negative aesthetic impacts of communications towers and antennas <br /> The undisputed evidence at the December 12 , 2000 public hearing before the Board of County <br /> Commissioners established that Nextel already has a good quality signal and is providing personal <br /> wireless services within the area which would be affected by the proposed antenna tower. Indeed , <br /> it 1s undisputed that Nextel seeks to construct the above-described antenna tower for the purpose of <br /> "off loading traffic " based on the volume of projected cellular phone use m the area . <br /> Bit u _ <br /> JANUARY 30 , 2001 - 14 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.