My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2001 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
11/13/2001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2020 3:49:33 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:31:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
11/13/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2549
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based upon staff, s analysis, the stormwater management level of service standards would be met by <br />limitin_ off-site discharge to its peak pre -development rate of 1762 cub <br />retention of the 1ic feeUsecond and requiring <br />,299,;7; cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the propene. <br />As with all development, amore detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most <br />intense development that could occur on the subject property under the proposed land use <br />designation indicates that the adopted level of service would be maintained. The following table <br />illustrates the additional park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and <br />the existing surplus park acreage. <br />LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) <br />4.0 <br />Concurrency Summary <br />PARK INFORMATION <br />Project Demand (Acres) <br />3.92 <br />Surplus Park Acreage <br />1,164 <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including stormwater management, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater,have <br />adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed <br />land use amendment. Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. <br />Consistency with Comprehensive Plan <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies <br />of the Comprehensive Plan. As per section 800.07(1) of the County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan <br />may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to <br />Section 163.31 77(2), F.S." Amendments and rezonings must also show consistency with the overall <br />designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, <br />residential, recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan that identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development decisions --including plan amendment and rezoning decisions_ <br />While all comprehensive plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in <br />reviewing plan amendment and rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request are the <br />following objectives and policies: <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 <br />The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with <br />the county's Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that <br />at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria <br />are: <br />November 13, 2001 <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.