Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />i?% <br />• Street Lights: Streetlights will be provided at all street entrances, intersections, and <br />curves and will be owned and maintained by a private property owners association. <br />• Limited Access Easement: A limited access easement is required along 41St Street and is <br />depicted on the preliminary plat. The easement will need to be granted prior to or via the <br />final plat. <br />• Stormwater and Recreation Tracts: Stormwater tracts, easements, and recreation tracts <br />will be the responsibility of a private property owners association. <br />13. Environmental Issues: <br />• Wetlands: The site contains 2.82 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, which are located in <br />the northeast comer of the project site. The applicant is proposing to preserve the <br />wetlands, therefore, no mitigation criteria apply However any nuisance exotic <br />vegetation on the site will be required to be removed In addition, the applicant is <br />proposing to place a conservation easement over the preserved wetlands. <br />• Native Upland Setaside: Since the site is over 5 acres and contains native uplands, the <br />county's native upland setaside regulations apply to this site. About half of the site (14.7 <br />acres out of 28.66 acres) is native upland habitat. To satisfy the 2.21 acre (15%) setaside <br />requirement, the applicant proposes to establish 2.73 acres (18.57%) of upland <br />conservation easements over various tracts within the project. <br />14. Waivers: The PD plan proposes to reduce the minimum lot size standard from the RS -3 <br />zoning district required 12,000 square feet to 9,375 square feet. The PD plan also proposes to <br />reduce the minimum lot width from 80' to 75', the minimum right-of-way from width 50' to <br />40', the minimum front and rear yard setbacks from 25' to 20', and the minimum side yard <br />setback from 15' to 7.5' and 10'. These requested waivers are mitigated by proposed buffers, <br />increased perimeter setbacks, conservation tracts, increased minimum open space, and <br />common recreational amenities. It should be noted that the homes will be set back 45' from <br />the perimeter (25' perimeter buffer tract plus 20' rear yard setback on the lot). <br />The project density of 1.96 units per acre is consistent with the densities of conventional <br />RS -3 subdivisions. These generally range from 1.5 to 2.6 units per acre, depending upon how <br />stormwater management is designed. In this case, the applicant's design trades some lot area <br />for common area (preservation areas and perimeter buffers). With a conventional (non -PD) <br />RS -3 subdivision, the common area would instead be included as part of individual lots. The <br />result would be bigger lots but less common area — although the density would be the same <br />under either option. Similar to the Kenwood Village PD design, this plan incorporates <br />perimeter buffers which provide a compatibility measure to compensate for the smaller lots <br />on the perimeter. In essence, the applicant s design does not spread the 1.96 units/acre over <br />as much land as a conventional (non -PD) RS -3 subdivision would, but provides a more <br />compact developed area. The preservation area, perimeter buffers, increased setbacks, and <br />density of 1.96 units/acre provide a development design which i s c ompatible with the <br />adjacent RS -3 zoned area. <br />November 5, 2002 <br />50 <br />