My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/5/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
11/5/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:22:19 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:49:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
11/05/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2562
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stated below are adequate to ensure compliance with <br />infrastructure and technical requirements and are adequate to <br />ensure compatibility between the special exception use and <br />surrounding land uses. Based on these findings and the <br />conditions that the applicant has volunteered, the Board of <br />County Commissioners approved the special exception use <br />request with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance <br />of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase III: A. The eastern <br />driveway on 12th Street (construction entrance) shall be <br />removed; and B The applicant shall pave 12th Street from the <br />project entrance driveway to the existing paved portion of 12th <br />Street.} <br />The Chairman called a 5 -minute recess at 12:35 p.m. The meeting was reconvened <br />at approximately 12:41 p.m. All were present except Commissioner Macht who had to leave <br />the meeting for another commitment. <br />9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - REQUEST FROM LINDA & <br />RON SPICER TO DISCUSS RIVER ISLAND DOCK PERMIT <br />The Board reviewed an email wherein Mr. Ron Spicer requested to be on the agenda <br />concerning the River Island dock permit. <br />Ron Spicer questioned some of the information from his last meeting with the Board <br />concerning the River Island dock. (See minutes of October 22, 2002, Item 9 B 2) He <br />questioned the total protrusion being allowed for a moored boat (8.5') and dock (9'), that it <br />is greater than 25% over the width of the canal (15'). (Clerk's Note: Mr Spicer's drawing <br />is on file in backup.) Second, he was told by the Code Enforcement office that field <br />November 5, 2002 <br />85 <br />tel <br />L <br />7:.) <br />(27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.