Laserfiche WebLink
Alternative 3: Rural Villages <br />Alt. 4: No Change <br />• Viable uses currently allowed <br />• No need for more residential land <br />• Right -of --way is a good boundary <br />• EAR begins in 2005 <br />• No relief for Mr. Clontz or others <br />Conclusion <br />• No perfect land use patt <br />ern <br />• County currently has power to control type <br />of development <br />• Moving USA boundary <br />won't eliminate <br />incompatibilities <br />December 12, 2000 <br />116 <br />Alternative 3 Issues <br />• Preserves agriculture, open space, & habitat <br />• Preserves rural character <br />• Promotes community identity <br />• Lowers initial infrastructure costs <br />• Promotes efficient delivery of public services <br />• Difficult to implement <br />• Requires land consolidation <br />• Requires cooperation among multiple land owners <br />Variables (alts. 1 & 2) <br />• Location •Abutting designation <br />• Density • Buffer width <br />• Depth • Notification requirements <br />• Caribbean Fruit Fly host plants <br />Recommendation <br />• Give staff direction regarding the initiation <br />of a comprehensive plan amendment <br />