My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/12/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
12/12/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2018 4:30:59 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:47:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/12/2000
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 1 1 ' ' 1 ' I ' , ' ' <br />� i � <br />1 ' I <br />■Stanley Keely, of <br />WCG Inc. in Maitland, <br />presented the results of <br />the master plan to the <br />Indian River County <br />Utilities Advisory <br />Committee on <br />Thursday. <br />By MICHAEL KAISER <br />Press Journal Statl Writer <br />Indian River County should <br />implement mandatory garbage co'i- <br />lection and close down the trash <br />transfer stations, according to a re- <br />cently completed Solid Waste <br />Master Plan. <br />The county and its residents <br />would save money if everyone <br />were required to have curbside <br />garbage pickup, consultant Stanley <br />Keely said. <br />Keely, of WCG Inc. in Mait- <br />land, presented the results of the <br />master plan to the Utilities Advi- <br />sory Committee on Thursday. <br />"I know that is tremendously <br />controversial." Keely said. "The <br />major thing it does is allow the <br />shiltdown of the collection centers. <br />They are very expensive to oper- <br />ate." <br />Keely said the current network <br />of transfer stations cost $80 to $90 <br />a ton to operate. Collection fees <br />would also drop because garbage <br />haulers would have more custom- <br />ers and would no longer have to <br />do their own billing, Keely said. <br />About a decade ago, the <br />county utilities staff proposed <br />mandatory garbage collection, but <br />a citizen outcry defeated it. The <br />county eventually did adopt curb- <br />side recycling of newspaper, plas- <br />tics and glass. <br />Under the current system, all <br />property owners pay a landfill as- <br />sessment of $76 per year to pay for <br />garbage, disposal. For wllection, <br />residents either haul thew own gar- <br />bage to one of five transfer sta- <br />tions or pay a hauler to pick it up <br />at the curb. In the unincorporated <br />area of the county, voluntary curb <br />side collection costs $148 per year, <br />Keely said. <br />For residents who pay for col- <br />lection, such a system is more ex- <br />pensive than in neighboring coun- <br />ties, Keely said. While residents in <br />Indian River pay a total of $224 <br />for collection and disposal, resi- <br />dents in St. Lucie County pay $156 <br />and Brevard County $152. <br />"You can see you're out of <br />whack here. That's kind of dra- <br />matically different," he said. "I <br />certainly think they're going to see <br />some savings on the collection <br />side." The system can also be ineq- <br />uitable because residents who pay <br />for collection are also paving for <br />the maintenance and operation of <br />the transfer stations, Utilities Di- <br />rector Don Hubbs said. <br />"If you're doing voluntary col- <br />lection at the curb, you're also <br />paying for the free (transfer sta- <br />tion) access that you're not using," <br />he said. <br />Keely said the cost reduction is <br />difficult to quantify until the col- <br />lection contracts are renegotiated <br />or put out to bid, but residents <br />could expCct a reduction of at least <br />10 percent. That's the reduction <br />that residents saw in St. Lucie <br />County, which recently instituted <br />mandatory pickup, he said. <br />Most members of the utilities <br />committee were supportive of <br />mandatory collection, at least in <br />the more heavily populated areas <br />of the county. <br />"Countywide collection is the <br />way we're going to have to go; it's <br />just a matter of time," member <br />Frank Oberbeck said. "Another <br />problem is (illegal) dumping <br />throughout the county by people <br />who are too Lary to go to the <br />transfer station. Mandatory collec- <br />tion would reduce that." <br />Commissioner Stanbridge advised she had received numerous phone calls after this <br />matter had been reported twice in the Press Journal. She called on Utility Services Director <br />Donald R. Hubbs to clarify. <br />Utility Services Director Donald R. Hubbs explained that a Master Plan is in the <br />works and called the newspaper article "premature". Mandatory collection is just orae ofthe <br />many issues that the Utility Advisory Committee (UAC) is discussing. The initiati�✓es will <br />have to come before the Board of County Commissioners first and will be approached one - <br />December 12, 2000 <br />143 <br />8K1i�PG473 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.