Laserfiche WebLink
11.11.3. BRINE CONCENTRATE DISPOSAL PERMITTING - <br />NORTH COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER <br />TREATMENT PLANT - CAMP DRESSER MCKEE WORK <br />AUTHORIZATION #19 <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 13, 2001: <br />DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 2001 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: W. ERIK OLSON, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICE <br />FROM: GENE A. RAUTH, OPERATIONS MANAGER C5 A CK <br />SUBJECT: BRINE CONCENTRATE DISPOSAL PERMITTING NORTH <br />COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS NATER TREATMENT PLANT <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Construction on the North County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant, was <br />completed and commissioned in June of 1998. Under the Florida Department of <br />Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit to construct and operate, the plant is permitted <br />to produce 3.53 million gallons per day (MGD) of potable drinking water. As a result of <br />the RO process, the plant produces both potable drinking water, and by-product brine <br />concentrate. Under a separate discharge permit with the FDEP, the plant is allowed to <br />discharge the brine concentrate by-product to the Indian River Lagoon at the County <br />Road 510 bridge. <br />On August 8, 2000, Camp, Dress, & McKee Inc. (CDM), assisted the Department of <br />Utility Services with submittal of applications and supporting documentation required to <br />renew the FDEP discharge permit. The Department of Utility Services has received and <br />replied to FDEP's request for additional information for renewal of the discharge permit. <br />County Staff and CDM have since met with representatives of FDEP on two separate <br />occasions, to further discuss the renewal of the discharge permit. The discharge permit <br />for the North County Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant has since expired, on <br />February 9, 2001. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />In a meeting on June 18, 2001, representatives from the FDEP informed the County Staff <br />and CDM that the discharge permit would not be renewed, and future plant expansion <br />would not be permitted utilizing the current discharge location FDEP went on to explain <br />DECEMBER 4, 2001 E j <br />-112- <br />