My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/4/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
12/4/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2018 4:26:31 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:32:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/04/2001
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2549
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Utilities and Services <br />The site is within the Urban Service Area of the aunt}. Potable water distrihution lines extend to <br />the site from the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant. Although the site is in the Central <br />Wastewater Service District, wastewater collection lines do not extend to the site. <br />Transportation System <br />The site is bounded on the east by US 1. Classified as a neral principal arterial roadway on the future <br />roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of US 1 is a four lane road with approximately 120 <br />feet of public road right-of-way. Currently, there are no plans to expand this portion of US L <br />The site is bounded on the west by Old Dixie Highway. Classified as a rural major collector <br />roadway on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map, this segment of Old Dixie Highway is a two <br />lane road with approximately 66 feet of public road right-of-way. Currently, there are no plans to <br />expand this portion of Old Dixie Highway <br />Zoning District Differences <br />There are some similarities and some differences between the existing CL zoning district and the <br />proposed CH district. The CL district is intended to serve, and be more compatible with, nearby <br />residential development. Therefore, in terms of permitted uses, the CL district is generally more <br />restrictive. In contrast, the CH district allows somewhat more intense commercial development. <br />The differences between the districts are best illustrated by their purpose statements. These purpose <br />statements are as follows: <br />• CL, Limited Commercial District. The CL, Limited Commercial District, is intended to <br />provide areas for the development of restricted commercial activities. The CL distnct is <br />intended to accommodate the convenience retail and service needs of area residents, while <br />minimizing the impact of such activities on any nearby residential areas. <br />• CH, Heavy Commercial District. The CH, Heavy Commercial District, is intended to <br />provide areas for establishments engaging in wholesale trade, major repair services and <br />restricted light manufacturing activities. The CH district is further in <br />to provide <br />lopment of commercial and industrial uses allowed <br />support services necessary for the deve <br />within other non-residential zoning districts. <br />ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the rezoning request will be presented. <br />Specifically, this section will include: <br />• an analysis of the request's impact on public facilities; <br />• an analysis of the request's consistency with the county's comprehensive plan; <br />• an analysis of the request's compatibility with the surrounding area; and <br />• an analysis of the request's potential impact on environmental quality. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale <br />development. The comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Recreation (Future Land Use Policy 3.1). <br />The adequate provision of these services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed <br />by the community. The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be reviewed to <br />ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these services and facilities are maintained. <br />DECEMBER 4, 2001 <br />-66- <br />y <br />F r 4Y ki � <br />Bi <br />h <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.