My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/4/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
12/4/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2018 4:26:31 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:32:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/04/2001
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2549
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Bob Keating revieW ed the project using a <br />POWER POINTTM presentation and stated, in response to several questions, that Grovenor <br />Estates' lots are a little smaller than required by RS -3 zoning but larger than required under <br />RS -6 zoning. In order to get 300 units on this parcel, the owner would have to submit a <br />planned development application. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />Diane Cabral, 3129 11t' Street SW, Grovenor Estates, was opposed to the project <br />and had concerns about the amount of traffic that would be created. She stated that The <br />Colony is being developed with 550 single-family and 200 multi -family residences with a <br />golf course located on 27`h Avenue; Arbor Trace has 151 single-family residences in <br />construction; and there are a number of commercial properties also in construction. There <br />is only I paved and 1 unpaved road going into Grovenor Estates and Stirling Lake Estates <br />and the traffic is already very difficult. Oslo Road is not scheduled to be expanded until <br />2020 and the proposed 1-95 off ramp would only create more traffic. <br />Donna Rutledge, 1276 32nd Avenue SW, read a petition bearing 124 signatures in <br />opposition to the project. (COPY OF PETITION IS ON FILE WITH THE BACKUP FOR <br />TODAY'S MEETING.) They are all concerned about the type of homes proposed to be <br />built, the noise level, the impact on the neighboring schools and the traffic impact. She also <br />expressed her concern for the local wildlife and her pleasure in walking in the neighborhood. <br />DECEMBER 4, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.