My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/4/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
12/4/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2018 4:26:31 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:32:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/04/2001
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2549
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ravech & Others' Rezoning <br />Request <br />RS -3, Single -Family Residential District <br />(up to 3 units/acre), <br />to <br />RS -6, Single -Family Residential District <br />(up to 6 units/acre) <br />Criteria Analyzed <br />• Concurrency <br />• Comprehensive Plan Consistency <br />• Compatibility <br />• Environment <br />Compatibility <br />• Same the of developmem <br />as to the west <br />- singlafamily residendal <br />• Most development to the <br />west meets RS -6, not RS - <br />3, lot size & width criteria <br />- same lot size & width as <br />most devetopment to the <br />N HI <br />• Transition <br />Sufficient capacity & plan <br />designation <br />- up to 6 unhYacre <br />Request Is compatible <br />DECEMBER 4, 2001 <br />Background <br />Location <br />• 50.3 acres <br />• Oslo Road & <br />31st Avenue <br />• Vacant, wooded <br />Concurrency <br />• Potable Water <br />• Wastewater <br />• Solid Waste <br />• Transportation <br />• Recreation <br />• Stormwater <br />Management <br />Impact on the <br />Environment <br />• Same regulations <br />• 10-15% upland <br />preservation <br />• Fed., state & county <br />wetland regs apply <br />No significant <br />impacts on important <br />environmental <br />resources <br />• Staff <br />recommends <br />approval <br />• Adoption of <br />attached <br />ordinance <br />-85- <br />PZC Action <br />• PZC voted 3 to 2 to recommend denial <br />- Technically faded <br />• 7 member boards need 4 votes to pass a <br />motion <br />• No official recommendation <br />Comprehensive <br />Plan <br />• L-2 Land Use <br />Designation <br />• Low Density <br />Residential up to 6 <br />units/acre <br />- FLUE Policies 1.11 <br />& 1.12 <br />Consistent with <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />Conclusion <br />• Compatible with <br />Surrounding Area <br />• Consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan <br />• No Impacts on Public <br />Facilities <br />• No Significant <br />Environmental <br />Impacts <br />• Staff Supports the <br />Request <br />Ud1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.