My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/12/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
02/12/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:44:21 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:35:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
02/12/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2554
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Shelly Ferger, 25 5'h Street, Vero Beach, spoke as a 35 -year resident and a do <br />trainer. Her sister's stepson is the 6 -year old child who was severely bitten about the face <br />by a pit bull. She expressed several concerns regarding dog bites and the Animal Control <br />Department. She described two incidents to enhance one ofher concerns that there is no one <br />to contact, thus no enforcement, after 5 pm and on weekends The excuse has been budget <br />restraints and she believed that traditionally animal control has had a low priority. She felt <br />there needs to be better control of a dog and particularly if a dog shows a potential to do <br />harm it should not be returned to its owner as she understood was done in this dog -bite case <br />In her opinion, the dog should have been put down due to the severity of the injury to Evan. <br />She also thought better records should be kept by the department. She did not want to see <br />a "breed ban" as has happened in other counties. She was willing to work with any group <br />the Board might institute to improve this concern. She urged the Board to look into this <br />issue. <br />In response to Vice Chairman Tippin's inquiry, Administrator Chandler advised that <br />the release of animals is spelled out in the ordinance and the dog in question would have <br />been released to the owner, but he understood the owner had the dog put down. He <br />understood there was no previous record in Animal Control on that particular dog. <br />Commissioner Adams recalled the animal control ordinance was reviewed and <br />discussed at length in 1997 and perhaps it is time to revisit and improve it. She suggested <br />the working hours of the animal control officers could be staggered. She believed agd <br />ogs <br />can be aggressive and no one wanted to see anybody hurt. She has seen where dogs in packs <br />have killed cows, not a pretty sight. She felt the Board should be able to set the criteria high. <br />Vice Chairman Tippin suggested that at budget time the Board should look at <br />improvements in the Animal Control Division. <br />Commissioner Macht suggested perhaps an interlocal agreement with the Sheriffs <br />February 12, 2002 <br />46 <br />iT) <br />ii a L. i <br />-J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.