Laserfiche WebLink
the way everything is tracked. It was mutually agreed that under paragraph 6, that a two- <br />part numbered ticket system would not be required. <br />County Attorney Bangel asked if statutory language "based on sound accounting <br />practices and procedures, of the Association" could be added to track the Statute, and Mr. <br />Earman thought there would be no objection as long as it was in line with what the State <br />requires. <br />Chairman Ginn understood that all the problem areas were covered, and Mr Earman <br />added that the Association still owes the County about $8,000 and they would be cutting a <br />check very soon. <br />Commissioner Adams thought the addition ofthe building would make the event more <br />profitable and the outdoor pavilion would be coming along soon to allow outdoor displays. <br />She would be more comfortable if the extension service was to move forward with more <br />home economics that she has not been seeing as part of the fair. She felt it needed to be <br />addressed. She praised the Association for a good job, It is a very nice family event, and <br />traffic control and cleanliness of the grounds are exceptional. There is not a fair elsewhere <br />in the state that can hold a candle to what they do. <br />Mr Earman appreciated the compliments. <br />ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Stanbridge, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved the <br />agreement with the Indian River County Fair Association, Inc., <br />with the changes as discussed (reviews not audits, addition of <br />language based on sound accounting practices, and no <br />requirement for two-part tickets), and authorized the Chairman <br />to execute the same. <br />February 13, 2001 <br />BR 117 PG 161 <br />152 <br />