Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Redefine specimen tree" to be based on specific tree characteristics vs. the current procedure. <br />which is to require a special action of the Board to designate a particular tree as a specimen tree <br />before anv added protection measures can apply. <br />• Increase "specimen treeprotection requirements. <br />• Clarify tree removal exemption categories (particularly the agricultural exemption). <br />• Define a "critical root zone" for trees to be protected. with the radial size of the critical root zone <br />depending on tree characteristics such as tree type (species) age. and health (condition). <br />Increase penalties for illegal u-ee removal from the current S500 per tree to S1.000 per nee (for <br />non specimen protected trees) and to S5.000 per tree (tor specimen trees). <br />ANAi YSI! <br />Adequacy of the existing ordinance <br />The County first adopted its tree protection ordinance in 19S3: the ordinance has remained relatively the <br />same since that time. In 1990. however. a significant change to the ordinance occurred when the Count. <br />redefined "protected tree" to be more encompassing by reducing the size threshold from S" diameter to <br />4" diameter. The County has also taken significant steps to preserve comununiries of natne trees. via the <br />County's native upland plant communities I5°0 set-aside requirement. as well as through the County s <br />environmental lands acquisition program. In addition. the County has strengthened its landscape <br />ordinance requirements over the years to provide incentives for the planting of native trees associated <br />with new development. <br />Notwithstanding the Countv's successes in protecting existing native trees and promoting the piannng of <br />native trees. a number of tree removal violations this past year have brought attention to cenain <br />inadequacies in the County's tree protection requirements. From a staff perspective. there are two main <br />issues: (1) adequacy of protection of a trees critical root zone" from construction disturbance. and (2) <br />adequacy of enforcement and penalties. <br />Critical Root Zone <br />Measured from the base of a tree, a "critical root zone" is a radial area that warrants protection from <br />construction disturbance to ensure survival of the tree. The current tree protection ordinance identifies a <br />tree "protected area" (comparable to a "critical root zone") as based upon the tree "species. age, site. <br />condition of the tree, or soil condition. topography. means of protective barrier proposed. or other <br />relevant criteria ... In no event shall the protected area be less than mt area measured jive 15) legit <br />radially from the center of the tree at its base fatless expressly determined by the environmental planner <br />that a smaller specified protected area may be established.' <br />The problem with the current "protected area" as described is that the ordinance does not provide <br />specific guidance on how to determine the appropriate size of the area. given a particular circumstance. <br />To address that issue. staff has researched other ordinances and studies. and is proposing use of the <br />attached tables. which contain specific criteria for determining the critical root zone. It should be noted. <br />however. that by strictly defining how a critical root zone is determined. the current flexibility of the <br />ordinance in establishing the size of the zone) will be lost. As a result. more trees may actually be <br />reproved because of the loss of flexibility that nov. allows for attempts to save trees in "tight quarters." <br />Nevertheless. -the new approach would result in better protection of those trees that are able to be saved <br />in the context of development. <br />Enforcement and Penalties <br />As previously indicated. the County has had success in protecting native trees. The issue. however. is to <br />reduce the failures. Although the majority of developers are diligent in their compliance .with county tree <br />February 13, 2001 <br />85 <br />BK 117PG097 <br />