11/4/1952 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

October 15, 1952 • Mr. James F. Barrett Vero Beach Florida 1 0 1 W.� 1 1 n U Dear Sir: 269 1 In consideration of your conveyance of the right of way described in State Road Department Deed No. 201, Section $$01 (691), State Road 5,,the Board of County Commissioners agree as follows: 1. That the County will move the existing building on the - property which abuts on the new right of way line South and East so that the building will be located near the center of the highway frontage you own at this spot and back off the road. :It is understood that in this moving the County will not be required to rebuild or replace that part of the building which has a concrete floor on the South side of the building. 2. The County will set the building back up and reestablish it in good condition as it was prior to the moving. 3. All of the above will be done prior to the time that possession is taken of the right of way you are conveying and you may remain in possession of the right of way conveyed until construction of the road begins. Yours very truly, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By W. C-. Graves, Jr. Chairman There being no further business, on motion made, seconded and carried, the Board then adjourned. ATTEST: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4. 1952 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County met at the Court House in Regular Meeting at 9:00 ofclock A. M., Tuesday, November 4, 1952, with the following members present: W. C. Graves, Jr., Chairman; H. C. Watts, J. J. P. Hamilton, Aubrey L. Waddell, and Allison Warren. Also present were S. N. Smith, Jr., Attorney; E. E. Carter, Road and Bridge Superintendent; L -.'B': OtSteen, Sheriff and Douglas Baker, Clerk. Minutes of October 7, 1952, were read and the same were approved upon motion of Commissioner Hamilton, seconded by Commissioner Waddell and carried. Messrs. Kelly, Nuzie, Kittrell, Spillman, Locke, and others, appeared before the Board seeking information with regard to the possibility of paving Emerson Avenue. Mr. Kelly speaking for the group, outlined the importance and necessity of this road to the resi- dents and property owners in the area affected, and stated that in their opinion other roads had been constructed and improved in preference to Emerson Avenue and to their way of thinking was not exactly right or as it should be. The Board explained to the Committee the procedure of designating roads to be paved and/or improved under the primary and secondary road program and as to the source of revenues for the road program. After considerable'discussion in the -matter pro and con Commissioner Warren stated to the group that he would be glad to assist them in taking a poll of the residents and