Laserfiche WebLink
'The side yard setback will range from 0' to 8', with all buildings being separated by a minimum of 8', except along east <br />perimeter where RS -6 setbacks apply <br />'No building, pool, patio or deck can be located within the 30' Jungle Trail Buffer or within 25' of the west perimeter; <br />whichever distance is greater. <br />'Open space will be guaranteed through the setbacks on each individual lot and the overall controls on the conceptual PD <br />plan. <br />General Note: Roof overhangs can encroach in privately dedicated easements, no other structures shall be allowed to <br />encroach in easements of any type. <br />General Note: For lots with more than one front yard; a 6' fence can be placed in one of the front yards to provide privacy for rear <br />yard amenities. <br />General Note: Roof overhangs are allowed to encroach 3' onto the adjacent property. <br />General Note: The developer is requesting a 40' wide private right of way for the local road within the development. In <br />addition to the 40' wide right of way, there will be an 8' utility easement on both sides of the right of way to form a 56' <br />wide roadway and utility corridor. <br />The approved conceptual PD plan requires a 10' wide Type "C" buffer along the project's east <br />property line adjacent to Oceanaire Heights and Spring Place subdivisions. All of the lots along <br />the east perimeter meet the RS -6 size and dimensional criteria (70' width, 7000 sq. ft.), which <br />provides a measure of compatibility for the lot owners in Oceanaire Heights and Spring Place. <br />Presently, the setbacks for the Old Orchid lots along the east perimeter are 20' front yard, 10' <br />side yards, and 25' rear yard with pools allowed to be within 10' of the rear property line These <br />setbacks are generally consistent with the RS -6 zoning district, except that the rear yard is <br />actually increased from 20' to 25'. From a compatibility viewpoint, the Old Orchid east <br />perimeter lot sizes are consistent with the zoning of the adjacent property; the side yard setbacks <br />are the same as the adjacent property; there is a greater rear yard setback (20' vs. 25'), and a <br />Type "C" buffer is provided pursuant to the compatibility matrix in section 915.16. Therefore, <br />staff believes the request is compatible with the adjacent single family homes to the east. <br />The applicant's request is that the intemal front yard setback be reduced from 20' to 10' for the <br />lots along the east perimeter. This change in the building envelope configuration is needed to <br />accommodate longer homes that the developer has built elsewhere in the development and <br />wishes to build on the east perimeter Lots. <br />Staff has no objection to the internal front yard setback being reduced from 20' to 10', as <br />requested. Since the front yards are internal to the development, the difference in the setbacks <br />would not impact properties adjacent to Old Orchid. The change would make the front yard <br />setbacks for the east perimeter lots consistent with the front yard setback for all other lots within <br />Old Orchid. Such consistency is desirable for the developer and will not adversely impact <br />adjacent properties. <br />FEBRUARY 19, 2002 <br />-34- <br />