My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/20/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
2/20/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 7:03:29 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:14:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
02/20/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2275
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.YaUp. <br /> .0 � %(.. . a. ,� ..�; <br /> a. �low.fk <br /> s f Y+ x �, aaYf z•* ' g` - z <br /> After the January 9'h meeting, the <br /> meeting discussions with some co applicant contacted staff and indicated that he had some <br /> commissioners . According to thea post <br /> with <br /> indicated that the condition to double the recreation areas may have b <br /> and that alternatives could be acceptable . applicant, in those meetings <br /> alternatives the Board would need to a Staff advised theaant y been excessive <br /> pprove the scheduling of a rephearinc that to consider such <br /> requesting that the Board grant a rehearing The applicant is now <br /> condition that is currently in effect . b to formally consider amending <br /> the recreation area <br /> ANALYSIS : <br /> The Board may reconsider a PD plan special exception use approval condition at a rehearing. Such <br /> a rehearing was conducted in November 2000 for a PD plan condition attached to The Colony PD <br /> Project. As was the case with The Colony rehearing, the applicant will bear the cost of advertising <br /> and noticing the rehearing , which will be a public hearing. <br /> As was the case with the January 9}h PD plan , the revised proposal presented by the applicant s <br /> (see <br /> attachment #4) exceeds the PD ordinance minimum standards and may be approved by the Board. <br /> The change in circumstances from the January 9th meeting is that the applicant is proposing <br /> approximately 12 ,000 sq . ft. more recreation tract area and specific recreational facilities on that tract <br /> ( tennis courts , small parking area, playground and play field area ) . <br /> RECOMMENDATION : <br /> Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant the applicant ' s request for are - <br /> hearing <br /> ro <br /> hearing to reconsider the recreation tract areas condition attached to the Legend Lakes PD ect . <br /> P J ` <br /> ATTACHMENTS : <br /> 1 • Letter of Request <br /> 2 • Location Map <br /> 3 • January 9th Plan (old plan ) <br /> 4 . Revised Plan ( proposed ) <br /> 5 . Draft Minutes of January 9 . 2001 B . C. C. Meeting <br /> ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams , <br /> SECONDED by Commissioner Macht , the Board , <br /> by a 4 - 0 vote (Vice Chairman Stanbridge absent) <br /> unanimously granted the request for a rehearing to <br /> reconsider the recreation tract areas condition <br /> attached to the Legend Lakes PD project . <br /> FEBRUARY 20 , 2001 <br /> -47 - <br /> r � <br /> �.X W <br /> x 5 'k6¢ x" �+.' 'P` y* rY} r"' r+, <br /> .n "TM <br /> Se�s <br /> ' kd,..* „ .>3 . .s*.' ..fir �2z ~x. d'.:- e, 2 f-: }-=' *f s te•� 4 x a r x a . <br /> � y. r ce-L�; .{% >at; �. .-, x 4k <br /> dr 4 ::', ,an ,u3` � W,., e t.'vr ."p' , . Y� ' - `F Gi _.• 3 .3'; : n, aas 3',� 5' ., ::�: W f t :^"� <br /> t. � ., `�k c 4"� s� .. -.: �:'�: ..etlz ; ,,,a,.,.. . r" YF � F <br /> Nkr <br /> -' -v 1� _, . � , xfi ;F� ,..,. .. '. y`NAW _,. . , S.+Y, "c W.'- -. -.N * s h•, „ v �a7; .; <br /> k N ,±. , <br /> +� <br /> �i1s <br /> a„� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.