My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/5/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
2/5/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:13:51 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:35:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
02/05/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2554
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Since the Gibson Street roadway improvement will be 700 linear feet in length <br />and may affect 30 to 40 feet of wetlands throughout its entire length, the total <br />Gibson Street wetlands impact could be about a half acre. This is a half acre more <br />of wetlands impact than was anticipated by the HCP and ITP. Both of those <br />documents envisioned the right-of-way being abandoned and being incorporated <br />into the NSCA property. <br />For the Kirrie proposal to be implemented, the wetlands issue will need to be <br />addressed by two agencies First, FWS will need to approve the improvement of <br />Gibson Street since the ITP is conditioned on the right-of-way being abandoned. <br />Second, the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) will have to <br />issue an environmental resource permit for the wetlands impact. There may be <br />mitigation required by that permit <br />Besides wetlands, native uplands will also be impacted by the Kirrie proposal. <br />Although the NSCA Natural Communities Map indicates that the County owned <br />land designated by the Kirrie proposal for swap is scrubby flatwoods, a recent <br />field check revealed that the 60 foot wide strip is xeric oak scrub. Unlike scrubby <br />flatwoods the subject strip does not have a predominant tree canopy; instead, it <br />consists largely of oak scntb and other scrub type vegetation. <br />The County property proposed for swap contrasts significantly with the Kirrie <br />land proposal for swap. Unlike the County property, the Kirrie land is not <br />resource" area. It is open, previously cleared property. <br />Construction of an access road on the County 60 foot strip would result in the <br />removal of virtually all the xeric scrub vegetation on the property. Because xeric <br />scrub is the most productive scrub jay habitat, the road construction will impact a <br />federally protected species. In contrast to the County 60 foot stnp, the Kirrie <br />swap land is not resource property which would provide comparable benefit if <br />conserved. For that reason, FWS may require mitigation for the loss of resource <br />value. <br />Although the Kirrie swap strip is not resource property. it could serve to preserve <br />resource land. Because a 20 to 30 foot fire break must be created and maintained <br />along the perimeter of the NSCA to allow for prescribed burns, the unvegetated <br />Kirrie swap strip could serve as the fire break along that boundary of the NSCA <br />With that, there would not be a need to clear resource property for a fire break. <br />That advantage is offset, however, by the need to create fire breaks along portions <br />of both sides of the new access road and portions of both sides of the 700 foot <br />Gibson Street paved area. These fire breaks are not needed if the Kirrie proposal <br />is not implemented. <br />• Infrastructure <br />As indicated, the Kirrie proposal involves construction of 700 feet of Gibson <br />Street and construction of an access road on the County swap strip. With these <br />roadways management of the NSCA will be more difficult. These roadways will <br />physically separate a portion of the NSCA from the remainder of the conservation <br />area, making both fire management and site security more difficult. To prevent <br />illegal dumping and prevent off road vehicle access, the County will need to fence <br />both sides of both roadways. <br />FEBRUARY 5, 2002 <br />• <br />-65- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.