My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/20/2001 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
3/20/2001 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2023 11:37:55 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/20/2001
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2275
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■ PZC AND PSAC Consideration: <br />Both the Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) and the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission (PZC) have reviewed the proposed regulations. On January 15. 2001, the PSAC voted <br />to recommend approval of the regulations with some minor modifications. Staff agreed with these <br />modifications and incorporated them into the proposal considered by the PZC at its January 25, 2001 <br />meeting. At its meeting the, PZC discussed the issue of special corridor lighting regulations. Citing <br />concerns about sea turtle lighting and "over lighting", the PZC voted to recommend approval of the <br />modified regulations with further changes that would prohibit, rather than merely shield, certain <br />types of lighting (such as high pressure sodium and mercury vapor) within the corridor. Because <br />such a prohibition would involve technical development issues, staff informed the PZC that staff <br />would present these proposed changes to the PSAC which would review the con-idor lighting issue <br />and provide its recommendation to the Board on that issue. <br />When the PSAC considered the corridor lighting issue at its February 15, 2001 meeting, it concluded <br />that light shielding and lighting intensity issues should be addressed. However, the PSAC differed <br />with the PZC's recommended approach. The PSAC recommends putting the current "standard <br />corridor" light shielding requirements into the proposed regulattons0and addressing the lighting <br />intensity issue later, with technical standards rather than by imposing a blanket prohibition on certain <br />types of lighting. Based on the PSAC's recommendation. the PSAC and staff are researching various <br />approaches to address lighting intensity and will be making separate recommendations on that issue <br />in the future. Staff agrees with the PSAC s approach and desires to move forward with corridor <br />regulations rather than delaying adoption to allow time to address technical lighting details. <br />Thus. the PZC recommends that the Board adopt the North Barrier Island Corridor special <br />regulations with the lighting subsection of those regulations to contain a prohibition of certain types <br />of lighting (see attachment #9). The PSAC and staff recommend that the Board adopt the North <br />Barrier Island Corridor special regulations with the lighting subsection of the regulations requiring <br />shielding of lighting but no outright prohibitions. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />• North Barrier Island Development: Predominately Residential <br />The north barrier island is almost entirely zoned for residential and conservation uses. Remaining <br />agriculturally zoned properties (south side of CR 510 west of Jungle Trail. and the north Jungle Trail <br />area), are designated on the Comprehensive Plan for future residential development The only <br />commercially zoned area in the unincorporated area of the county on the North Barrier Island is at <br />CR 510 and SR A -1-A. That commercial area is small and contains the restaurant and inn portion <br />of the Disney residential resort. the Wabasso beach shops and offices. and the office/commercial <br />building at the northwest comer of CR 510 and SR A -1-A In essence. there is no vacant commercial <br />acreage in the unincorporated area and it is anticipated that no additional commercial land use <br />designation amendments/rezonings would be approved on the North Barrer Island. Therefore. <br />further development of the North Barrier Island will consist of a few new residential projects. some <br />single family home re -builds", public improvements, and perhaps some redevelopment of existing <br />office/commercial facilities. <br />• Models: Wabasso Corridor and CR 510 East Corridor Regulations <br />The Wabasso Corridor Plan was initially adopted in 1995 and originally focused on non-residential <br />development and public projects (e.g. road projects, Causeway landscaping). The Wabasso Corridor <br />March 20, 2001 <br />BKii1PG522 <br />50 <br />A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.