My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/5/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
3/5/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 2:04:23 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:36:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
03/05/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2554
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Solid Waste <br />Solid waste service includes pick-up by private operators and disposal at the county landfill. The <br />county's adopted level ofservice standard for landfill capacity is 1.97 cubic yards/person/year With <br />the county's average of approximately 2 3 persons/unit, a 196 unit residential development would <br />be anticipated to house approximately 450 people (2.3 X 196). For the subject request to meet the <br />county's adopted level of service standard of 1.97 cubic yards/person/year, the landfill must have <br />enough capacity to accommodate approximately 886.5 (450 X 1.97) cubic yards/year. <br />A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the <br />availability of more than 800,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 2 year <br />capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff <br />determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site <br />under the proposed zoning district. <br />Stormwater Management <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stoi uiwater regulations which require <br />on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stomnwater <br />Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian <br />River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited <br />from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the <br />approved IRFWCD discharge rate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property <br />does not lie within a floodplain. However both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply. <br />With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning district, the maximum area of <br />impervious surface would be approximately 19.68 acres. The maximum runoff volume, based on <br />that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD <br />two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 863,065 cubic feet. In order to maintain <br />the county's adopted level of service the applicant would be required to retain approximately <br />624,937 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is <br />estimated that the pre -development peak runoff rate is 58.38 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staffs analysis, the stormwater management level of service standard would be met by <br />limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four <br />hours, and requiring retention of 624,937 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the <br />property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most <br />intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates <br />that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the additional <br />park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus <br />acreage. <br />March 5, 2002 <br />70 <br />Bit <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.