My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
4/10/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2020 3:58:25 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:18:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC - Continuation of 4/10/01
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/10/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2277
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Budget Manager Jason Brown felt there would be a lower number of filings than <br />originally projected. Staff estimates that of the total homestead exemptions of 28,000, about <br />2,065 would be eligible for the additional exemption. The impact on ad valorem taxes would <br />be approximately $328,674 for all county taxing funds. Rather than a tax loss, it will be <br />more of a tax transfer to other residential and commercial properties. <br />Assistant County Administrator Joe Baird noted that the county is the only taxing <br />district the Board controls but emphasized that staff believes this is an outside number. The <br />state estimate was very high. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge stated that she had a number of calls regarding this issue <br />and some of the people who called were in a very critical financial position, having to decide <br />between paying for prescription drugs or property taxes. <br />Mr. Brown noted that, based on a $100,000 assessed value, those who qualify for the <br />additional exemption would see their taxes go from $618 to $415. Those who do not qualify <br />would only see an increase of approximately $3.82 based on the projections. <br />Chairman Ginn questioned whether the Property Appraiser has staff to deal with this <br />and what proof of income will need to be provided. <br />Property Appraiser David Nolte stated that his staff is ready and able to handle the <br />exemption and he believed the proof would be an income test, rather than an asset test. <br />Income tax returns would most likely be used. <br />Commissioner Macht felt this would establish an opportunity for fraud. He believed <br />that property taxes fall hardest on young families who are trying to establish a home. He did <br />not believe it would be a fair exemption and felt that the Legislature could have provided for <br />this additional exemption but wished to shift the burden down to the local level. He was <br />opposed to the additional exemption. <br />APRIL 10, 2001 <br />-70- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.