|
2 r.,..y, � �i$ '.F - .FS 'Y'ie9�} ..s4�e'S"i. N, b . Clk . tip ,xk,�•«�' ✓rn `t. t .
<br />'% y °e4 z A. t 'fid ` '9, ) �i
<br /> ` il� �+ .�,� ; 'S- o r� r :; ,; SFr, yil3. n � ii i•r,� '3 „ .xs =� '�` < y=
<br /> x t , � n*ka, + z ^- Via :, x"z'tz,•r§"�# i . ;. "EYP k"�:-.. F '.§, :�` ±:.,.. � � vw ;c" r
<br /> .. « ; Rn.. x +. }' ' .� r;
<br /> is
<br /> VII
<br /> 11
<br /> why the DCA ignored those points and negotiated other sets of rules . He also thought the
<br /> ;. LAAC rules should not be violated and he favored the preservation of the islands . He
<br /> i
<br /> believed funding was available through the Federal Land and Water Acquisition Fund and
<br /> some State funds , and since the Governor alluded to using some of those funds , we ought to
<br /> take him up on it .
<br /> Joan Pannenborg , 709 Shore Drive , concurred with Mr . McClure ' s presentation .
<br /> e ,
<br /> ) w She quoted from EPA , Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program , concerning habitats
<br /> : of fish , birds , and organisms . She called their attention to a February 4 , 2001 , Press Journal
<br /> If
<br /> article regarding two stranded dolphins with infection in the Indian River Lagoon . She also
<br /> brought up the test bores on the islands , that slurry has been allowed to flow into the water
<br /> of the Lagoon , and a $ 25 , 000 per day fine for the violation of US Code Title 33 . Her point
<br /> was that whether in error or design , disruption to the wildlife and pollution of the waters will
<br /> ,r
<br /> r � -
<br /> occur . She also quoted from an article in the Maryland Law Review which says that takings
<br /> 5 A
<br /> are a legitimate protection of the rights of the public . She suggested it was incumbent on the
<br /> County and the State of Florida, by virtue of the public trust doctrine, to protect the fragile
<br /> a
<br /> ecosystem of the Indian River Lagoon and to provide for the good and welfare of the citizens
<br /> of Indian River County and the State of Florida . If the Lost Tree Village Corporation is
<br /> resistant to negotiation and intransigent , the County should set aside existing monies and
<br /> consider using those monies for a taking and let the Courts decide the value of the properties .
<br /> Lucy Falk, 170 Anchor Drive , heard the Governor ask Mr . Cox the value of the land .
<br /> Mr . Cox responded that it was not worth anything without the bridge . She would have fired
<br /> him on the spot if he had been her attorney . Nonetheless , she suggested they wait until the
<br /> court decides about the bridge .
<br /> Vice Chairman Stanbridge reminded everyone that the final recommended order has
<br /> if
<br /> not been adopted by the DCA which says the bridgehead ordinance is permissible . So , if the
<br /> April 17, 2001
<br /> if
<br /> 53
<br /> FG 9 14
<br /> iJ^
<br /> y
<br /> n �`✓'ft'u r. C ' ..a. J. >h • $ n . . ' , � f. ' ".N' 3^ �y,.e. i ri'vw '_.4. akF . -_ � ii
<br /> .A ;h .. > }> �:':' .s^'�, ' :Y }" x+'s
<br /> =fit z � s '�' ... ,:. - : as�� ) ,.: � e ,a -ra•.e �` .v",v2 J � 3k etism+��� '�.'
<br /> q' 'tz`.,.y .. «>� C��1" �..::
<br />
|