My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/2/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
4/2/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:58:29 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:38:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/02/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2555
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
e. Landscaping. <br />An average of one canopy tree (minimum height of twelve <br />(12) feet with six-foot spread at time of planting) and two (2) <br />understory trees (minimum height of eight (8) feet at tin -ie of <br />planting) shall be provided for every thirty (30) feet of the <br />tower base/accessory structures' opaque fenced perimeter. <br />Credit shall be given for existing tree located between the <br />tower base perimeter and adjacent , areas that are being <br />buffered. The required trees shall be planted in a pattern to <br />maximize screening of the base area of the tower from the <br />view of adjacent road rights-of-way and adjacent <br />residentially designated or residentially used properties, <br />without conflicting with any guy wires. Trees credited or <br />planted to meet this screening requirement shall be located on <br />property under the control of the applicant to ensure that the <br />screening trees are preserved and maintained. Shrubs and <br />understory trees used to make the fencing opaque shall be <br />planted on the outside fence perimeter. Alternative <br />landscaping plans which provide for the same average <br />canopy and understory trees but propose alternative siting on <br />the parent tract of the proposed facility may be considered <br />and approved by the Planning Director, provided the <br />proposed alternative maximizes screening as provided above. <br />(2) Submittal requirements for replacement antenna -supporting structure <br />applications: <br />a. For a proposed replacement antenna -supporting structure <br />application to be considered complete, it shall contain the same <br />submittal materials required as indicated in Section 5(a)(2) a. <br />through i., k., 1. and n (1) through (4). <br />(c) Colocations on an Existing Antenna -Supporting Structure. <br />(1) Approval criteria for colocations on existing antenna -supporting <br />structures: <br />a. For a colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure to <br />be approved, it shall meet with approval cntena h. through j., <br />and 1. as indicated in Section 5 (a) (1), as well as the following: <br />b. Height. <br />A colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure <br />shall not increase the overall height of the antenna - <br />supporting structure, antenna and/or antenna array beyond <br />that allowed under Section 5(a)(1)b. <br />c. Structural Integrity. <br />Any colocation on an existing antenna -supporting structure <br />shall meet building code requirements (including <br />windloading). <br />(2) Submittal requirements for colocation on an existing antenna - <br />supporting structure applications: <br />APRIL 2, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.