My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/15/2001
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2001
>
5/15/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 8:16:04 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:20:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
05/15/2001
Archived Roll/Disk#
2277
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
d.tai ` "��Mmqww <br /> (.ae <br /> M i <br /> 11 . G . 2 . SR- 60 FOUR- LANE WIDENING WEST OF I - 95 - RIGHT- <br /> OF -WAY ACQUISITION - 1 DELTA FARMS WATER <br /> CONTROL DISTRICT (PREMIUM CITRUS AND CITRUS <br /> FROM INDIAN RIVER),(2 ) A KROMHAUT , AND (3 ) <br /> JAMES CAIN <br /> The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 1 , 2001 : <br /> TO : James E . Chandler , <br /> County Administrator <br /> FROM : James W . Davis , P . E . <br /> Public Works Directo <br /> SUBJECT : SR 60 Four - Lane Widening West of I - 95 - Right - of - Way <br /> Acquisition <br /> REF . LETTER : 1 , T . G . Rogers , Jr . to Jim Davis dated March 26 , 2001 <br /> 2 . William W . Caldwell to James Davis dated March 9 , 2001 <br /> 3 . Alexander Kromhaut to The Urban Group dated Feb . 20 , <br /> 2001 <br /> DATE : May 1 , 2001 <br /> DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br /> Last summer , the MPO directed the Public Works Director to meet <br /> with SR60 Property Owners west of I - 95 and FDOT to assist in <br /> resolving right - of - way acquisition for the four - laning of SR60 . As <br /> you know , this project has been delayed since unresolved design and <br /> compensation differences exist between FDOT and property owners <br /> north of the proposed widening . The basic stumbling block has been <br /> the property owners desire to raise the proposed berm north of SR60 <br /> to elevation 28 . 5 ( approximately elevation of existing road ) and <br /> the DOT ' s position that raising the berm is not necessary for flood <br /> protection . The property owners request that DOT raise the berm <br /> and pay all damages associated with the raising , including loss of <br /> trees , access roads , drainage tiles , etc . The DOT has agreed to <br /> raise the berm , but not to pay certain related damages or land <br /> costs . <br /> MAY 15 , 2001 n <br /> - 73 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.