My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/11/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
6/11/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:47:00 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:40:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
06/11/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2557
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Commissioner Ginn questioned whether the owner of the Racquet Club lives in the <br />subdivision and will be a part of the assessment. <br />Assessment Project Manager Dan Chastain stated that the owner of the Racquet Club <br />had signed the petition in support of the service but the service will be for the benefit of the <br />homeowners in the subdivision, although service will be provided to the Club. The parcel <br />where the Club is located does not fall under usage assessment rules. However, the property <br />owners have agreed to the method of assessment for the Club. <br />Commissioner Ginn then questioned what would happen should the owner of the <br />Club subdivide that property in the future, and Mr. Chastain responded that scenario had not <br />been discussed. <br />Mr. Chastain continued that the Club property has little frontage and it would <br />probably not be feasible to subdivide the property. However, if the property were <br />subdivided, the developer would be responsible for the infrastructure, including utilities. The <br />service line being provided to the Club is very small and would not accommodate further <br />development. <br />JUNE 11, 2002 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, the Board <br />unanimously approved the above project and <br />authorized staff to proceed with the engineering <br />design work and award a contract for survey <br />services based on the most favorable quote in <br />preparation for the special assessment project, as <br />recommended by staff <br />-41- <br />1 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.