Laserfiche WebLink
2, 3, 4, and 5 marked by a red tab in the Report and reviewed the recommendations on Table <br />5 of the Space Needs Committee for 2020 as follows: 431 employees (estimated), 390 sq. <br />ft./employee, 170,000 sq. ft. building/annex, and 2.82 employees/1000 population <br />(estimated). <br />Commissioner Ginn advised the next speaker would be Ital Veron and listed his <br />credentials. <br />Ital Veron advised that he would address the subject of the location for a County <br />Administration Building and that he would conclude his remarks with 7 committee <br />recommendations. He reviewed the 8 sites that had been proposed (see yellow tab in the <br />Report - Veron - Table 1) as well as the 10 site -selection -criteria utilized (see Veron - Table <br />2). He explained why certain sites (see tab 6) were eliminated and displayed aerial <br />photographs provided by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to illustrate why <br />property to the north of the current and presently -owned Administration Building was <br />recommended by the Committee. He explained the population intensities within the 1, 2, <br />3, and 5 mile radii of the location stressing that 62% of the population of the county live <br />within that 5 mile radius. The Committee believed the location meets the criteria of being <br />in the center of population but emphasized that the extension of 20th Avenue to Aviation <br />Boulevard is critical. <br />Mr. Veron then listed the seven (7) recommendations ofthe Space Needs Committee <br />as follows: (1) The County remain in the current location and acquire additional land to the <br />north of the present Administration Building for the project as illustrated in the Spillis <br />Candela report. (2) The County immediately hire a dedicated project manager who is <br />technically oriented to coordinate the project internally and that he/she be on board prior to <br />the selection of the architect and design stage. (3) The County immediately begin the <br />process for the selection of an architectural firm. (4) That local architects, engineers, and <br />June 18, 2002 <br />36 <br />01/ <br />