Laserfiche WebLink
, -..,; <br /> d, + .±.,...Si � ., T- .' '. .. Y 7 .�, ,. . ..:. K : .: ., . .u . ... ...a .. . ,. .. ...`i x . : <br /> s.. i s . . „ - : , � . . ,.. s � 1 . � �+ � ;,..✓ r .f rsr; � ^s <br /> gx, rv-r'. a .," . , � .-v<• �.. .+. ..S„n. . � e+ ,< .�. ay x lyx= a :: 3 a:F e s;. '. k ` � s k <br /> - r lei ��"Yp N' S � s" s 5 � <br /> ' .� a3'M' K4 e �r� ,L• .3i .. r, e- - �� � ,b . , a 'A�'�a1'�*� £ 3 . `" '. a� <br /> F 4 ,LV 1 "v � ! � <br /> commercial with 10, 000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for rezoning . The <br /> site information used for the concurrency analvsis is as follows : <br /> 1 . Size of Area to be Rezoned : ±18. 7 acres <br /> � . Land Use Designation : <br /> C/19 Commercial/Industrial <br /> � . Existing Zoning District : CG , General Commercial District <br /> 4 . Proposed Zoning District : IL, Light Industrial District <br /> 5 . Most Intense Use Under Existing Zoning District: <br /> ±187,000 sq, ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6`h Edition ITE Manual ) <br /> 6 . Most Intense Use Under Proposed Zoning District : <br /> ±187,000 sq, ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in the 6' Edition ITE Manual <br /> As per section 910. 07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the county ' s land development <br /> regulations , projects which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br /> requirements . This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested <br /> zoning would not increase the use intensity of the site . <br /> By changing the zoning of the subject property from CG to IL, some Industrial uses not cu <br /> allowed would be permitted on the site. However, because the most intense use of the property <br /> would be the same with either zoning district, changing <br /> not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities .the Property ' s zoning P perty <br /> from CG to IL would <br /> In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with site development .concurrency analysis will address facility <br /> service levels and demand . p nt . That <br /> Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br /> Industrial development on the subject propertywould ould be compatible with surrounding areas. In fact <br /> because the adjacent property on the south <br /> zoning pattern . is zoned IL, the request is for a continuation of an existing <br /> AdditiAdditionally, compatibility issues are not anticipated to be a problem for land to the <br /> east of the site, since that land is essentially an undeveloped, city-owned, airport buffer: or for land <br /> to the west of the site, since that land is also owned by the applicant . <br /> The primary impacts of industrial development on the subject site would be on the residentially <br /> designated parcels to the north of the subject property . The parcels that are directly north of the <br /> subject property, along the north side of 41 s' Street, consist of single- family houses on approximately <br /> 1 acre wooded lots . Any impact on those parcels would be somewhat mitigated by the wooded <br /> JUNE 199 2001 <br /> 4 U <br /> -40 - <br /> ! <br /> 7x. <br /> 'ndh ;t } ar. <br /> .: <br /> tz. <br /> , �' <br /> R <br /> s <br /> "�aYr <br /> : _ <br />