My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/4/2002
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2002
>
6/4/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2019 1:43:17 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 4:40:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
06/04/2002
Archived Roll/Disk#
2557
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously approved Change <br />Order No. 1 for $2,974.00 and approved final payment and <br />release of retainage in the amount of $5,855 with funding from <br />account #312-108-575-066.51, as recommended in the <br />memorandum. <br />CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IS ON FILE <br />IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />11.G.2. RFP NOS. 4047 & 4048 - SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS <br />FOR BRIDGE DESIGN SERVICES - CONTRACTS A AND B - <br />NEGOTIATIONS AUTHORIZED - BRIDGE DESIGN ASSOCIATES~ <br />INC. (CONTRACT A) AND KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />(CONTRACT B) <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of May 22, 2002: <br />TO: James Chandler, County Administrator <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P E , Public Works Director <br />FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineers/ <br />SUBJECT: Selection of Consultants for Bridge Design Services, Contracts A and B — <br />RFP Nos. 4047 & 4048 <br />DATE: May 22, 2002 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />r <br />After proper publication of RFP No. 4047 for Bridge Design Services, Contract A and RFP No. 4048 <br />for Bridge Design Services, Contract B, the County received response submittals from seven (7) <br />firms for each RFP (the same firms submitted on both). In lieu of "short listing" firms for both <br />contracts and having presentations for both contracts, we "short listed" the following firms to <br />provide a formal presentation for the two contracts, with the understanding that one firm would be <br />selected for Contract A and one firm would be selected for Contract B. Short listed firms are as <br />follows: <br />June 4, 2002 <br />87 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.