|
d"2 ri = v r .:.ry � � r ., . . 5 3( t "v ✓ , ,. :':a e , . .. . .,._ . .. Y 4 4P:
<br /> $ ^_r..T . . {
<br /> A-
<br /> .
<br /> a . .. . . .^ . .r•, , . . - . . 9 . : .:h. , . . ,.c .4 : . n 't, F. t,+c, . s n
<br /> �
<br /> ., .3Y' a+ . .c . �," . .. -.. . .d, . .�, .i, :. . .:. .v ., - ,� .. �, x;'? � ':;::. � , .;t i :,�,
<br />. ,n '' ,.. >xx 'ai:" . J ;x : .: .xa. . y , .�.• a � -3 € 4�
<br /> , atr . . . .. , . k, + . ��� .`' *1� ,.. .���� a+�.. -T` _ , .., yA*, „•„ :'.: .� „ .:;, r : .s':'rbi
<br /> n :� 'rY^'r . > ., K4d, a „3i,. f� r.. 'rA' x"' �.- .
<br /> �" rurr ->•r z wr+ t fi k � � -# t .'.:•< '" �, x y , ^,t a �... .� ;4 , . [.
<br /> yH�L 3� �°"."3'' ��'-'�`rt4n r �c�.,,u 2�
<br /> . "..�. f `�
<br /> sx -, �, ...,.
<br /> € t '
<br /> t
<br /> ,
<br /> f ,
<br /> With Alternative 3 , the Rural Villages option , the Board has the opportunity to implement a
<br /> permanent solution . Although , compared to Alternatives 1 and 2 , this option takes longer and is
<br /> more difficult to implement, it also comes close to meeting all of the Board ' s objectives . Through
<br /> the transfer of development rights , the Rural Villages alternative could provide relief to Mr. Clontz
<br /> and to all similarly situated parcels . If properly designed, rural villages can preserve open space and
<br /> active agricultural operations, and reduce incompatibilities . Additionally , the compact design of F ,
<br /> Rural Villages allows more efficient provision of public services . Perhaps more significantly , the
<br /> Rural Villages option can preserve the rural character and community identity of an area .
<br /> It is important to note that there is no single perfect land use pattern that implements all
<br /> comprehensive plan policies ; eliminates all incompatibilities ; efficiently uses land, infrastructure ,
<br /> and public services ; provides "relief ' to Clontz and other similarly situated property owners : and
<br /> preserves agricultural resources , natural habitat, and open space . In fact, several land use scenarios
<br /> may achieve some or all of those goals . Regardless of what land use pattern the Board chooses ,
<br /> however, land use disputes will not be eliminated. Moving land use designation boundary lines may
<br /> reduce incompatibilities . but it will not eliminate them. With that in mind, several alternatives have
<br /> been presented. Attachment 7 , Summary of Alternatives . describes each alternative and summarizes
<br /> the advantages and disadvantages associated with each alternative .
<br /> If the Board chooses Alternative 2 ( Staffs Transitional Residential land use designation ) , there
<br /> appears to be consensus that such land should be located along arterial roads that serve as urban
<br /> service area boundaries and contain both water and sewer lines within the road right -of- way . The
<br /> Board, however, is not limited to the alternatives presented . If the Board decides to create a
<br /> Transitional land use designation , it can choose whether or not to use the criteria used in Alternative
<br /> 1 , Alternative 2, some combination of those alternatives . or some other criteria. If the Board chooses
<br /> to create a new land use designation , then the Board must make a decision regarding each of the
<br /> following variables :
<br /> • Location - Should the new land use designation be limited to land south of SR 60 ? This is
<br /> 1
<br /> the fast growing area that previously has been the primary focus of discussion .
<br /> • Density - What should be the maximum density permitted within the new land use
<br /> designation ? Although both one unit/acre and three units/acre have been proposed , past
<br /> experience indicates that one unit/acre is not feasible to develop .
<br /> • Depth - How far from the arterial road should the new land use designation extend '
<br /> Generally , utilities are considered available to properties within a quarter mile of a line . r
<br /> • Abuttins Designation - Should the new land use designation be required to abut C/I
<br /> designated land ? The need for a Transitional land use designation is greater for farms that ki
<br /> abut residences than for farms that abut C/I uses .
<br /> • Buffer Width - Should a buffer be required where the new land use designation abuts
<br /> agriculturally designated land, and if so , what type and how wide ? A wide , dense buffer is
<br /> beneficial to mitigate potential agricultural/residential incompatibilities .
<br /> • Caribbean Fruit Flv Host Plants - Should these be prohibited within the new land use
<br /> designation ? These plants are currently prohibited in new subdivisions that are adjacent to
<br /> citrus groves , both inside and outside the urban service area.
<br /> • Notification Requirements - Within the new land use designation , should developers be
<br /> required to notify lot buyers about surrounding uses and the Florida Right to Farm Act ? The
<br /> county has a similar requirement for new development near airports . This may reduce
<br /> incompatibilities .
<br /> JUNE 59 2001 nK i I U, P '4 8
<br /> 1 .
<br /> - 65 -
<br /> w>flr
<br /> „'
<br /> f++ v 'Z r r`Lr +,¢ , /a a
<br /> .. . . v. . . . 5' M —. . r.... ,. 5"9 .,� i ,..i. s,e::. ' , _ Ya ^u en } ( v I }' >.:: L
<br /> Wil• `: ;, X G ht Y' �' t �� ,, y't; a � 'e M , `vYxy
<br /> x - �.z a. .r
<br /> #. .: � w,a x✓✓tr ,li'.:. „r,.;vnA
<br /> ..✓... ,. aY . ®- ,., _ #"' xa ..:� *r Y`nY+ . . . . 3 ,. , ? . , ,z v, . �2,., ,.,.>. : ., t ... i=
<br /> .). . s.. ni ,.,.. x .'es . . , ,,. ,.. . . Y rs .. . AS .r* a .,.M: a , :!
<br /> >v. . . . , . .+ , ' r.�`Yu- . .� ..,... . r . m,� r c'�, ,. < c:a_: .: •., r., 1 . >:, r . ... x , .:-,xf
<br /> A, ,. .a c 1 .r .,.> . . , . F> : r„ w F s 'r t.:._ 3c'' . .k<.
<br /> +�, . .. ..:,�,. . , � .: fir - „. , . . . 5 . . .. ,; ,x .. ,v.�' ,Y".",fi. , . x �.r• ,. x±'' . ..
<br /> '.. ~•<,, : : � `� -. - ;:, 4 , x
<br /> x,,. . ,. a. . �':: , . ,. . .. . . x -. �' .::'�. ... x ,. , ,..: s : 'a, .. +r ✓' t R';x
<br />� P e, yP*'.. � S2 f � €. . �Y t� - x',. � ;Sti+^i"�^. . � . . cr :+ r`. "�3 x N-p,r.y,: s '
<br /> "�+, n(8: ..� �✓,, nV. . a .. . .. ,.. , . . . :> . � ,.: +X''` � v, ,", ,, E,.: ,,,..,,, n r , ,s.. , '� "a>
<br /> xY:* ; 'a r s exr '�' , >a* � .. :;,w '+..,m`t k t !:.- �' ° x�t' „ t x ',�.,. . e r
<br /> ra. .._ . :. . ,. ,r, �� � : . " '�������.x . .J; �. „„ ,.: a.. �:., t . ,... rt a t. .) r�
<br /> }n � x ,..r;' , .::,. r vJA .,r r .� ,^5' �+r a•
<br />
|