Laserfiche WebLink
3 east. The eastern sites were all positive, up to the building but not necessarily underneath <br />the building. The mitigation plan has been submitted to the State Historical Preservation <br />Association and they concur with the findings. <br />Chairman Stanbridge felt the plan should go back to the HRAC for review of the new <br />information. <br />Commissioner Adams believed that the only question remaining is the question of <br />eligibility for the National Register, and felt there has been sufficient discussion with the <br />residents and developer. She questioned whether the Board could approve the <br />recommendation with an extra review to be performed on the southeast building. <br />Commissioner Ginn believed that was a part of the staff recommendation. <br />Chairman Stanbridge requested that "extraordinary resources" be changed to <br />"significant resources". <br />JULY 2, 2002 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by <br />a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Macht absent) <br />unanimously concurred with the Historic Resources <br />Advisory Committee's recommendation, changing <br />the word "extraordinary" in Item 3 to "significant", <br />and required the following conditions of site plan <br />approval of The Inlet at Sebastian project: that the <br />developer (1) record a County conservation <br />easement over the portion of the shell midden east of <br />Indian River Drive, with language included in the <br />conservation easement specifically referencing <br />-70- <br />