Laserfiche WebLink
be passive aesthetic areas at the entrance. At the rear of the property they have committed <br />to an active playground with swings and slides for children. They anticipate this will be a <br />subdivision for families with amenities for children and adults. Mr. Schulke then reviewed <br />his 4 page handout (copy on rite in the office of the Clerk to the Board) and elaborated on <br />the public benefits designed for this planned development that would not be required for a <br />standard subdivision, such as a perimeter buffer, internal sidewalks, rights-of-way <br />dedication, drainage, turn lanes, additional tax base and impact fees. He also did a cost <br />comparison for a PD versus a standard subdivision. <br />In response to Commissioner Neuberger concerning feasibility of multi -family for <br />part of this property, Mr. Schulke advised that his client wants to build a single-family <br />product and thinks it will do well. <br />Mr. Schulke confirmed Commissioner Lowther's understanding there would be <br />equipment, such as swing sets, in recreation spaces (Tract 8). <br />Commissioner Lowther liked the fact that these dwellings will be affordable. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried 4-1 with Vice Chairman Ginn opposed. (The Board <br />granted PD special exception use and conceptual PD plan <br />approval for "Paladin Place" with all the conditions as set out <br />V <br />n the memorandum [pages 6 & 7]. and as recommended by <br />staff.) <br />9.11.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - GEORGE <br />ELECTRICAL CODE VIOLATIONS IN THE COUNTY. <br />Deferred. <br />August 19, 2003 <br />