8/6/2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• In the attached proposed chapter 910 amendment ordinance, deletions are shown as while additions are shown as underlined Changes are on pages 3,5,6,7,8,9,10,12, and 13 of chapter 910, concurrency management system. Generally,` most of the proposed changes are minor clean up and terminology changing certificate of concurrency determination" to "concurrency certificate". to: revisions, such as Other changes are • Differentiate between a proposed industrial development or industrial rezoning commercial development or commercial rezoning in assessing versus a development project. the impact of a conceptual • Clarify when concurrency acknowledgement forms can be used to delay applying for a concurrency certificate (eg: at the time of site plan release or building permit issuance). On May 16, 2002, the Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) voted 5-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request. On June 27, 2002, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this request. Analysis In the past few years, there have been various occasions when applicants have requested a rezoning to an industrial or heavy commercial zoning district. These particular districts do not allow retail. commercial uses. Rather, these districts -allow uses that produce fewer traffic impacts than retail uses. Current concurrency management ordinance regulations, however, require that such rezonings be accompanied by a concurrency analysis that assumes development of 10,000 sq. ft. of retail commercial uses per acre of the rezoning site. Thus, under current regulations, the concurrency analysis for heavy commercial and industrial rezonings overestimates potential traffic impacts. Consequently, staff proposes changes to section 910.07(1)(a) to provide separate and more appropriate criteria for measuring concurrency impacts of a conceptual industrial and or heavy commercial development or an industrial or heavy commercial rezoning versus a conceptual commercial or office development or commercial rezoning. The following table shows the proposed 910.07(1)(a) criteria: For Residential Conceptual Projects, or Residential Rezonin•s General Commercial or Office Conceptual Projects, Comprehensive Plan Amendments to C/I without Rezoning, or Rezonings to PRO, OCR, MED, CN, CL, CG Heavy Commercial or Industrial Conceptual Projects, or Rezonings to CH, IL, IG Pro'ect's Intensi Measured 13 (Maximum number of SF or MF units allowed per acre based upon the proposed zoning or land use designation) X Total Pro • ert Acres • (10 000 sq. ft. of gross floor area per acre of retail commercial) X Total Property Acres (20,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area per acre of general industrial) X Total Property Acres Besides the 910.07(1)(a) changes, section 910.37(1)(b)(3) is proposed for amendment. The purpose of the proposed changes to section 910 07(1)(b)(3) is to make it clear that applicants for subdivisions, plats, and multi -phase site plans may postpone applying for concurrency and paying impact fees and utility capacity charges until building permit time. For single-phase site plaf,sFand ,, sl uL. AUGUST 6, 2002 66. b 87