Laserfiche WebLink
commercial or multi -family planned developments, applicants may postpone applying for <br />concurrency and paying impact fees and utility capacity charges until site plane lease time. These <br />changes will provide more flexibility to developers, while ensuring that concurrency certificates are <br />obtained in a timely manner. <br />In most cases, the contractors who pull building permits are not familiar with the county's <br />concurrency requirements. Therefore, it is better for single phase project applicants or their <br />representatives to apply for and receive the necessary concurrency certificate at the time of site plan <br />release. <br />Changes to the ordinance include: <br />Page 3: <br />Page 5: <br />Page 6:. <br />Page 7: <br />Page 8: <br />Page 9: <br />Page 10: <br />Page 12: <br />Page 13: <br />Terminology changes <br />Changes to differentiate <br />industrial impacts <br />Terminology changes <br />Changes to concurrency <br />Terminology changes <br />Terminology changes <br />Terminology changes <br />Terminology changes <br />Terminology changes <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />general commercial impacts from heavy commercial and <br />certificate application timeframes <br />Staff, the Professional Services Advisory Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed LDR amendment to <br />revise chapter 910, concurrency management system by adopting the attached ordinance <br />Attachments <br />1. A copy of the unapproved minutes of May 16, 2002 PSAC meeting <br />2. Approved minutes of the June 27, 2002 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. <br />3. A copy of the Proposed LDR Amendment Ordinance <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the changes for the Board and noted that the <br />major change is in the chart for the concurrency analysis for site plans and rezoning. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />regarding this matter. There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />AUGUST 6, 2002 88 <br />3 <br />