|
Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study
<br />Table A-3
<br />Residents per Housing Unit (Unincorporated IRC)
<br />(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonakpopulation)
<br />(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30
<br />(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derma :from the 2011 American
<br />(4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item2)
<br />(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 adjusted downward by 6
<br />decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and>2010
<br />a
<br />Table A-4
<br />Housing Survey
<br />.8:percent to reflect the
<br />Residents per Housingnitq(IRCexcludingl duan River Shores)
<br />.
<br />Housing Type
<br />_
<br />Population(1)
<br />ri
<br />Housing
<br />2)
<br />Units(
<br />Ratio(3) I1
<br />iL_Unit_s_4'___i_with2010Adj's�
<br />Residents /
<br />i
<br />Housing f
<br />—2.44
<br />Residents /
<br />Housing Units
<br />Single
<br />Family
<br />54,671
<br />22,384
<br />__
<br />92% 2.24
<br />2.27
<br />- Less than 1,500 sf
<br />-
<br />100% 2.43
<br />92%
<br />2.24
<br />2.09
<br />- 1,500 to 2,499 sf
<br />-
<br />100%
<br />2.44
<br />2.27
<br />- 2,500 sf or
<br />greater
<br />18,571
<br />111%
<br />2.71
<br />2.53
<br />Multi-Family/Accessory
<br />11,944
<br />8,536
<br />Mobile Home
<br />1.40
<br />1.30
<br />Mobile Home
<br />7,454
<br />5,378
<br />2.06
<br />1.39
<br />1.30
<br />Average
<br />VA 113 98 a. 54,972
<br />2.04
<br />1.90
<br />Weighted Average 74,069
<br />36,298
<br />(1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonakpopulation)
<br />(2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30
<br />(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derma :from the 2011 American
<br />(4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item2)
<br />(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 adjusted downward by 6
<br />decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and>2010
<br />a
<br />Table A-4
<br />Housing Survey
<br />.8:percent to reflect the
<br />Residents per Housingnitq(IRCexcludingl duan River Shores)
<br />Source: 2000>Census, Table I-33'(adjusted1for peak seasonal population)
<br />Source: 2000Census, Table H-30
<br />Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey
<br />041161
<br />Population (Item 1<)'divided bythousing units (Item 2)
<br />Residents per housing_ ;unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the
<br />decrease in people per hong nit between 2000 and 2010
<br />Functional Population
<br />Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted
<br />methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for
<br />certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including
<br />residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the
<br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County
<br />January 2014 A-4 Impact Fee Update Study
<br />Housing Type
<br />Population(1)
<br />f
<br />Hous ng
<br />Units (2)
<br />f
<br />Ratio(3)
<br />Residents /
<br />Housing 1
<br />Units(4) _
<br />Residents /
<br />Housing Units
<br />with 2010Adj(5)
<br />Single Family %..
<br />_
<br />,84,211 `x.'1434,673
<br />____i
<br />2.43
<br />2.26
<br />- Less than 1,500 sf a
<br />92% 2.24
<br />2.09
<br />- 1,500 to 2,499,sf ,_
<br />100% 2.43
<br />2.26
<br />- 2,500 sftor;gre
<br />ate
<br />r;
<br />-
<br />111% 2.70
<br />2.52
<br />Multi Fami
<br />y/Accessory
<br />18,571
<br />" ;013,513
<br />1.37
<br />1.28
<br />Mobile Home
<br />'10,516
<br />X61786
<br />1.55
<br />1.44
<br />2.06
<br />Weighted
<br />Average
<br />VA 113 98 a. 54,972
<br />1.92
<br />Source: 2000>Census, Table I-33'(adjusted1for peak seasonal population)
<br />Source: 2000Census, Table H-30
<br />Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey
<br />041161
<br />Population (Item 1<)'divided bythousing units (Item 2)
<br />Residents per housing_ ;unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the
<br />decrease in people per hong nit between 2000 and 2010
<br />Functional Population
<br />Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted
<br />methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for
<br />certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including
<br />residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the
<br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County
<br />January 2014 A-4 Impact Fee Update Study
<br />
|