My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/21/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:55:00 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
239
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study <br />n umber of employees, since the service -demand characteristics can vary considerably by <br />type of industry. <br />Functional population is the equivalent number of people occupying space within a <br />community on a 24 -hour -day, 7 -days -a -week basis. A person living and working in the <br />community will have the functional population coefficient of 1.0. A person living in the <br />community but working elsewhere may spend only 16 hours per day in the community on <br />weekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends for a functionaipopulation coefficient of 0.76 <br />(128-hourpresence divided by168 hours in one week <br />VA person commuting into the <br />,e4 erf <br />county to work five days per week would have a functional population coefficient of 0.30 <br />? <br />(50 -hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week). Similarly; a person traveling into the <br />community to shop at stores, perhaps averagiaours per week would have a functional <br />population coefficient of 0.05. <br />Functional population thus tries to capture the. presence of all peop.fe within the <br />community, whether residents, workers;;or visitors, to<arrive at a total estimate of effective <br />population need to be served. <br />This form of adjusting population tohelp measure real facility needs replaces the <br />population approach of merel weighting. r• esidents two -,thirds and workers one-third <br />• OCAV <br />(Nelson and Nicholas 1992) By `estimating theyfunctional and weighted population per unit <br />of land use.across all majorr, <br />certainbfacilitiesand <br />uses ,in a community, an estimate of the demand for <br />the present and future year can be calculated. The <br />following paragraphs explain how functional population is calculated for residential and <br />n on-residential land uses. <br />ars <br />Residential Functional Population <br />�;..., <br />Developing the residential component of functional population is simpler than developing <br />the non-residential component. It is generally estimated that people spend one-half to <br />yew <br />three-fourths of their time at home and the rest of each 24-hour day away from their place <br />of residence. In developing the residential component of the Indian River County functional <br />population, an analysis of the County s population and employment characteristics was <br />conducted. Based on this analysis, it was estimated that people, on average, spend 16.4 <br />hours, or approximately 68 percent, of each 24-hour day at their place of residence and the <br />other 32 percent away from home. This analysis is presented in Tables A-5 and A-6. <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. <br />January 2014 <br />Indian River County <br />A-5 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.