My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/21/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:55:00 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
239
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Cost Component <br />This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the cost component of the <br />transportation impact fee update. Backup data and assumptions are provided for all cost <br />variables (for county and state roads), including: <br />• Design <br />• Right -of -Way <br />• Construction <br />• Construction Engineering/Inspection <br />• Roadway Capacity <br />Urban Design vs. Rural Design <br />Due to a lack of roadway construction data for rural -design roadways, the costsper lane mile <br />sMa: <br />for these types of roads was calcuiatedusing an adjustment factor. This factor was based <br />on the rural -to -urban design cost ratioF.fromm the most rete t�District 7 Long Range Estimates <br />(LRE) provided by FDOT.. .Ba�,�sed on he.. LRE, the.cost for `rural -design roadway capacity <br />s%g, <br />expansion (new road construction or lanesaddition) is approximately 83 percent of the cost <br />of urban -design roadway improvements. `For all subsequent tables (for county and state <br />roadways), costs are p sented' or urban -des gn roadways, with the rural -design roadway <br />costs beinetiretilated using the cost ratio from Table C-1. <br />ita <br />Table C-1 <br />Rural Design Cost Factor <br />Improvement <br />Cost per Lane Mile <br />Rural Design. <br />Urban Design <br />Ratio <br />A <br />X 072 Lanes: <br />$2,392,343 <br />$3,383,918 <br />71% <br />4Lang7 <br />$1,918,228 <br />$2,382,206 <br />81% <br />0-6Lapes <br />$1,626,803 <br />$1,944,969 <br />84% <br />2-4 Lanes <br />$2,897,987 <br />$3,439,476 <br />84% <br />4-6 Lanes <br />$3,229,018 <br />$3,833,955 <br />84% <br />4-8 Lanes <br />$2,145,375 <br />$2,532,536 <br />85% <br />6-8 Lanes <br />$4,061,468 <br />$4,569,033 <br />89% <br />Average <br />$2,610,175 <br />$3,155,156 <br />83% <br />Source: FDOT District 7 Long Range Estimates, 2013 <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. <br />January 2014 <br />C-1 <br />Indian River County <br />Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.