My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/21/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
01/21/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 3:55:00 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
239
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study <br />Affordable Growth Strategy <br />In the case of correctional facilities, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures <br />between Fiscal Years 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $2.3 million per year of <br />non -impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow <br />at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure 11-1 presents how impact fee levels would <br />change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents <br />the maximum impact fee calculated in this report. This level is considered the investment <br />needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the Coin may charge the maximum <br />amount of correctional facilities impact fee calculated 'ilthe historical levels of non -impact <br />fee funding were to be continued, the County woulgTnot need any impact fee revenue to <br />continue to maintain the current LOS. <br />It should be noted that the historical avertage non -impact fee contribution is based on <br />spending made for the last jail expansion, whichr-was completed in 2008:.. Since then, the <br />County did not have any nonimpact fee spending"and does not have any capacity <br />expansion projects programmed in .the°?GIP. This is <br />construction in that correctional facilities tend to require <br />provide sufficient capacity nfor a longer.:term than <br />mentioned previously fife current jail population <br />functional capacity <br />�.a. <br />reflective of "lumpy" nature of jail <br />large scale investments that <br />most other infrastructure types. As <br />is approximately 75 percent of the jail. <br />30096 <br />25096 <br />20096 <br />15096 _= <br />10096 <br />5O% <br />096 <br />Correct„_nal Facilities Impact'Fee— Affordable Growth Approach <br />Em- <br />IRCAAverage <br />Annual Growth <br />_,•Totattest <br />Mazimurri Impact -fee <br />—..-_1(905 Curve: <br />10•111•11M1 11111.1-.01M <br />• <br />0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.0096 4.00% 5.0096 6.00% 7.0096 8.00% 9.00% 10.0096 <br />Annual Growth Rate <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />January 2014 <br />21 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.