My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/06/2012 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
11/06/2012 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2016 1:20:19 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:19:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/06/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4056
Book and Page
143, 103-130
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission and staff for the Board to adopt the <br /> proposed Ordinance, which is based on a model floodplain ordinance developed by the Florida <br /> Department of Emergency Management (DEM) and the Florida Building Commission (FBC) . <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the proposed revision to Chapter 930 relating to structures <br /> that are exempt from permitting under the Florida Building Code, but still need to be reviewed <br /> for flood protection compliance (if located in a flood hazard area) . <br /> Vice Chairman O ' Bryan asked what would be involved in obtaining a flood plain permit <br /> for the above structures . <br /> Land Development Manager David Hays, County Engineering, with input from Chief <br /> DeBlois , elaborated on the flood plain permitting procedures and the types of structures for <br /> which the permits would be required. <br /> Vice Chairman O ' Bryan voiced concerns about how the proposed amendment to Chapter <br /> 930 might affect an individual who wanted to construct a non-residential structure, such as a pole <br /> barn or chickee hut. He asked that staff apply as much common sense as possible when these <br /> matters are under consideration. <br /> Mr. Hays, responding to Commissioner Davis ' s query, stated that an unenclosed building <br /> would not require a permit or soil impaction study. <br /> Commissioner Davis wondered why the County can' t effectuate the changes to the <br /> County Code (LDR amendments) by just adopting an ordinance that mirrors the state ' s model <br /> ordinance . <br /> 4 3 Pf123 <br /> November 6, 2012 11 <br /> l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.