My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/20/2011 (6)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
12/20/2011 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2016 2:27:15 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:10:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/20/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4051
Book and Page
141, 781-822
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
whether some type of fee would be factored in should a franchise agreement develop with the <br /> applicant. <br /> Attorney Polackwich responded that the processing aspect of Indian River Recyclers ' <br /> operation is probably the only operation that would fall under the franchise requirement. He <br /> also noted that haulers pay a 6% tipping charge to dump C&D materials at the landfill , and it is <br /> uncertain how this revenue would be collected if the haulers go to the new facility. He advised <br /> that staff would be returning to the Board with a proposed Ordinance changing the requirements <br /> for recycling operations that receive C&D materials . <br /> Chairman Wheeler expressed concerns about lost revenues at the landfill resulting in <br /> higher tax bills . He wanted to make sure that policies would be fair to both the applicant and the <br /> County. <br /> Attorney Polackwich reaffirmed the need for an updated Ordinance more in accord with <br /> today' s new recycling requirements and conditions . <br /> Attorney Morrell requested that the Board table this item until the Ordinance is <br /> updated . <br /> Mr. Bittle conveyed the applicant ' s agreement with the 1 , 500 cubic yard maximum <br /> storage amount for the concrete; however, the maximum storage amounts for the other materials <br /> are still being worked out. <br /> Vice Chairman O ' Bryan declared that he was satisfied with the 1 , 500 cubic yard <br /> maximum for the concrete stockpiles, but could not support the applicant ' s proposal as long as <br /> the maximum storage amounts for the other materials were undetermined. <br /> Ms . Wood asked the Board to ensure that the storage piles will be kept covered . <br /> 4 1 PG 808 <br /> December 20 2011 18 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.