My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/11/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
02/11/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:25:37 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:41:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
244
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 2013 <br />MM # 1351 <br />SANITARY SEWER FEASIBILITY STUDY & REPORT <br />NORTH SEBASTIAN AREA <br />CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br />This sanitary sewer Feasibility Study and Report for the North Sebastian Area has evaluated three <br />(3) alternative systems which are in use in Indian River County. They are the conventional gravity <br />sewer system, the vacuum collection system, and the low pressure system alternative utilizing <br />grinder pumps or the STEP system. The majority of the collection systems in Indian River County <br />utilize the gravity collection system. A vacuum collection system with over 400 users is located in <br />the Rockridge community of Indian River County and there are several scattered developments <br />and locations including Indian River Drive in Study Area #1 of this report which utilize low pressure <br />grinder pump systems. <br />Conceptual designs for each of the three (3) alternative systems are included in the report and are <br />used as a basis of estimating quantities of the elements needed to construct each of the alternative <br />systems. Estimated construction costs provided by a local, experience utility construction <br />contractor were applied to these various elements and the resulting project costs were estimated <br />for each of the alternatives. The alternatives and their estimated project costs are listed as follows: <br />Gravity Sewer System Alternative: $ 5,000,000 <br />Vacuum Collection System Alternative: $ 6,600,000 <br />Low Pressure Pump System Alternative: <br />Grinder Pump System. $ 8,600,000.00 <br />STEP System. $ 7,100,000.00 <br />The gravity sewer system alternative has the lowest project cost estimate. In addition, the gravity <br />system is the most reliable, does not rely on mechanical components, and is the least expensive to <br />maintain and operate. Finally, the gravity system does not have the disadvantages of the other <br />alternatives which include: <br />Requires much institutional involvement because the pressure and vacuum system has many <br />mechanical components throughout the service area. <br />• <br />• The operation and maintenance (O&M) cost for a pressure and vacuum system is often higher <br />than a conventional gravity system due to the high number of mechanical elements in use. <br />• Annual preventive maintenance calls are usually scheduled for grinder pump components of. <br />pressure sewers. STEP systems also require pump -out of septic tanks at two to three year <br />intervals. <br />• Public education is necessary so the user knows how to deal with emergencies and how to <br />avoid blockages or other maintenance problems associated with low pressure systems. <br />23 <br />31-35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.