My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/11/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
02/11/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 4:25:37 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:41:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
02/11/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
244
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(a) meets to discuss negotiation strategies, or (b) meets with any firm responding to the RFQ for <br />the purpose of hearing a presentation, discussions and asking questions, or negotiations, such <br />meetings may, at the election of the County, be held in private; provided, however, that a <br />complete recording shall be made of any non-public portion of the meetings, and no portion of <br />the non-public meetings shall be held "off the record." The recording of the non-public portion of <br />the meetings shall be considered a public record, under chapter 119, Florida Statutes which is <br />exempt from production to the public until such time as the County provides notice of an intended <br />decision, or until 30 days after opening of the proposals, whichever occurs earlier. <br />F. Ranking of Firms. The Evaluation Committee after any discussions with and/or <br />presentations by each short listed firm, shall vote on the final ranking. The ranking of firms shall <br />indicate the Evaluation Committee s determination of the firms that are most highly qualified to <br />perform the required services. <br />G. Ranking Reported to the Board. The Evaluation Committee's ranking of the firms <br />shall be submitted to the Board through the County Administrator by the Originating Department. <br />Upon final ranking and selection by the Board, the Originating Department shall proceed with <br />n egotiations• provided, however that if the estimated value of the services is $25,000 or Tess, the <br />Purchasing Manager, in consultation with the Originating Department, may determine final <br />ranking and selection, and if the estimated value of the services is $50,000 or less, the County <br />Administrator, in consultation with the Originating Department, may determine final ranking and <br />selection, <br />H. Negotiations The Originating Department shall negotiate with the firms in the <br />o rder and manner set forth in the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act, which generally <br />requires that the Originating Department first negotiate with the most qualified firm. If <br />n egotiations are not successful, the Originating Department shall formally terminate negotiations <br />with the most qualified firm, and shall commence negotiations with the second most qualified <br />firm. If negotiations are not successful, the Originating Department shall formally terminate <br />n egotiations with the second most qualified firm, and shall commence negotiations with the third <br />most qualified firm. If the County is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the <br />selected firms, the County may select additional firms responding to the RFQ in the order of their <br />competence and qualification and continue negotiations in the same manner until an agreement <br />is reached. <br />I. \Award of Contract. At the conclusion of successful negotiations, a contract, <br />approved by the County Attorney, shall be submitted to the Purchasing Manager (up to $25,000), <br />the County Administrator (up to 550,000) or the Board (up to and in excess of $50,000) for <br />approval. A copy of the executed contract shall be transmitted to the Purchasing Division for the <br />permanent file. <br />5.3 RANKING OF FIRMS IN RFP AND RFQ PROCESS <br />The ranking of firms in an RFP or RFQ process shall be done in the following manner: (a) the RFP <br />or RFQ solicitation documents shall list the evaluation criteria and assign a maximum number of <br />21 <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.